February 4, 2009

Shell Accused of Greenwashing, Again

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Royal Dutch Shell has been accused of exaggerating environmental policies in the past, and a new ad they’ve recently released is once again causing the oil company’s critics to yell “greenwashing,” Wall Street Journal reports.

Designed by JWT, the campaign focuses on Shell’s use of technology to harvest oil but one new print ad features a diagram of a human brain full of alternative and renewable fuel sources. That’s where the critics come in, saying that, contrary to what the ad implies, Shell is taking steps backwards in terms of clean energy.

A Greenpeace rep says that the company is trying to hide the fact that they’ve been pulling funding from renewable energy projects to extract oil from Canada’s tar sands. (The company recently said it would stop investing in Europe if utilities are forced to pay for emissions permits through auctions.)

Last August, Shell was reprimanded by UK’s Advertising Standards Authority for violating advertising rules when it claimed that the two oil projects in Canada and the U.S. involved sustainable forms of  energy.

That wasn’t the first time Shell faced criticism over its “green” advertising. Last year, Friends of the Earth Europe filed simultaneous complaints to the national advertising standards authorities of Belgium, the  Netherlands, and the UK about a Shell advertisement which Friends of the Earth says depicts the outline of an oil refinery emitting flowers rather than smoke and claims that it uses its “waste CO2 to grow flowers and [its] waste sulphur to make concrete.”

JWT says that the new greenwashing claims are unfair. Stef Tiratelli, JWT’s manager for Shell, says that the ASA doesn’t have much experience with green energy, and they’ve already made changes to their ads to comply with ASA standards.

According to the ASA’s Environmental Claims Survey 2008, 94 percent of ads with environmental claims were compliant with advertising codes.

In the U.S., the FTC has held three workshops to examine issues concerning the marketing of carbon offsets and renewable energy, green packaging, and green buildings and textiles.

With the FTC expected to update its “Green Guides” this year, the commission is likely to seek legal precedents by going after companies whose green claims have been under investigation.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Advertisements like these are committing one of the biggest credibility crimes there is: making claims that are inconsistent with your actions. Some day, an oil company will make a genuine attempt at a green reinvention — but after years of cynical, uncredible advertising, it will struggle mightily to get credit for the effort.

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."