February 25, 2009
First Solar Breaks $1/Watt Barrier for Photovoltaics
First Solar announced it has broken the $1 per watt price barrier in manufacturing photovoltaic (PV) solar module.
Since 2004, First Solar has decreased its manufacturing costs from over $3 per watt to 98 cents per watt in the fourth quarter of 2008. Mike Ahearn, First Solar chief executive officer, said in a press release he is confident the company can reduce costs even further.
A new study by the Lawrence Berkeley Lab found that costs of installed solar have dropped from $10.50 per watt in 1998 to $7.60 per watt in 2007. Researchers found that the reduction in nonmodule costs including labor, marketing, overhead, and inverters, was responsible for most of the overall decline in costs.
First Solar’s PV modules also have the smallest carbon footprint of any current photovoltaic technology, the company said, including the industry’s first and only comprehensive pre-funded, end-of-life module collection and recycling program. Over 90 percent of each collected module can be recycled into new products.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
Well congratulations to First Solar for driving the price of solar power down with their thin-film panels and excellent manufacturing processes. So what I am wondering is if PV panels are now $1/watt, Inverters are under a $1/watt, copper has dropped significantly in price, mounting racks/rails are dirt cheap then why oh why does it cost so darn much to have a solar PV system installed?
I challenge LBL to back their $7.6 / watt installed claim as my continual research at the residential power level in California indicates the rates are in the $9.50 to $11 range.
It appears that the industry is merely taking advantage of the ITC and utility incentives/rebates to line their pockets with profits at the expense of the consumer.
The solar industry better start to regulate itself and curtail the practice of fleecing the consumer. Otherwise the government is going to step and and demand accountability perhaps to the point of regulating prices.
Actually – given the recent stimulus bill with billions earmarked for renewables maybe now is exactly the right time to bring the government in to drive some sanity in the pricing models that are being forced on consumers and ultimately taking away much needed tax dollars that could be used to drive further solar/wind/natural gas deployments.
Jack Pouchet | February 26th, 2009
Jack Pouchet:
I don’t understand why you are outraged. Subsidies always raise the price of a good or service. The hybrid tax credit just got added to the price of the car. This is the same thing.
BobW | February 27th, 2009