<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Carbon Offsets Predicted To Grow 20%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/global-carbon-offsets-predicted-to-grow-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/global-carbon-offsets-predicted-to-grow-20/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Burman</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/global-carbon-offsets-predicted-to-grow-20/comment-page-1/#comment-110800</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Burman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=10734#comment-110800</guid>
		<description>In order for RGGI to be trading at 6% of global volumes, it would need to trade around 350 million Mt CO2e.

As stated in this article, if RGGI is going to be trading 339 Mt CO2e that would account for 0.0000057% of global volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order for RGGI to be trading at 6% of global volumes, it would need to trade around 350 million Mt CO2e.</p>
<p>As stated in this article, if RGGI is going to be trading 339 Mt CO2e that would account for 0.0000057% of global volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

