<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenpeace Releases Latest Recycled Tissue and Toilet Paper Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/greenpeace-releases-latest-recycled-tissue-and-toilet-paper-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/greenpeace-releases-latest-recycled-tissue-and-toilet-paper-guide/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/greenpeace-releases-latest-recycled-tissue-and-toilet-paper-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-314273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=10654#comment-314273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit dumbfounded as to why, after so many years, we still didn&#039;t figure out a better way to produce toilet paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit dumbfounded as to why, after so many years, we still didn&#8217;t figure out a better way to produce toilet paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Petra</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/greenpeace-releases-latest-recycled-tissue-and-toilet-paper-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-194654</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Petra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=10654#comment-194654</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so silly. Have you no idea what&#039;s going on in the world? Recycled paper is just the same quality.  You&#039;re a dork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so silly. Have you no idea what&#8217;s going on in the world? Recycled paper is just the same quality.  You&#8217;re a dork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/25/greenpeace-releases-latest-recycled-tissue-and-toilet-paper-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-110826</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=10654#comment-110826</guid>
		<description>Environmentalists have suggested that Americans use rough recycled paper for toilet purposes.
I agree, Americans have too long been pampered with softness.
The rougher paper will save a tree, and we can surely
endure a bit less softness.
The more I think about it, the environmentalists are so correct.
In fact we  can go back in time and use dried fluffed corn  cobs like my great grand father did. Of course the kernels were  removed. This would be more environmentally correct,  as no trees  would be sacrificed.
But, somehow I think Americans can do even better than that. Why hurt the soil by growing corn just to wipe the nasty excrement.
How about leaves of weeds which are not much use tfor anything....but no, that would surely disturb some nearly extinct mouse or toad.
No....after deep and sincire thought, I figure it would be best for the environmentalist to serve the movement ,
the economy and their fellow man to simply use their tongues and lick my ass.
No muss no fuss, soft , clean and environmentally correct.....NO....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmentalists have suggested that Americans use rough recycled paper for toilet purposes.<br />
I agree, Americans have too long been pampered with softness.<br />
The rougher paper will save a tree, and we can surely<br />
endure a bit less softness.<br />
The more I think about it, the environmentalists are so correct.<br />
In fact we  can go back in time and use dried fluffed corn  cobs like my great grand father did. Of course the kernels were  removed. This would be more environmentally correct,  as no trees  would be sacrificed.<br />
But, somehow I think Americans can do even better than that. Why hurt the soil by growing corn just to wipe the nasty excrement.<br />
How about leaves of weeds which are not much use tfor anything&#8230;.but no, that would surely disturb some nearly extinct mouse or toad.<br />
No&#8230;.after deep and sincire thought, I figure it would be best for the environmentalist to serve the movement ,<br />
the economy and their fellow man to simply use their tongues and lick my ass.<br />
No muss no fuss, soft , clean and environmentally correct&#8230;..NO&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

