March 5, 2009
Energy Secretary Chu Pledges to Work with Congress on Cap-and-Trade System
At a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing March 5, Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu promised to work with Congress to implement President Obama’s cap-and-trade system to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Under the system, a cap on carbon emissions would be imposed on U.S. power plants, oil refineries and other industrial sites, which then could bid at auction on permits to exceed those limits. Plants which decrease emissions could sell their permits to other facilities that pollute more.
Passing Obama’s plan as he envisions is not likely to be a walk in the park.
New Mexico Democratic Senator Jeff Bingaman, chairman of the energy panel, has indicated any Senate climate bill would not likely adhere to the strict auction plan for permits, which he says is too harsh on industry. Bingaman suggests that Congress develop a cap-and-trading emissions system with carbon allowances provided to polluters like cement factories and coal-burning power plants, along with permits that are sold.
Giving away allowances may prove counterproductive, however. In the European Union, the Emissions Trading Scheme, in addition to setting a cap that some say was too high, gave away a first round of emissions permits to polluters. This resulted in a transfer of wealth to the polluters, and eventually caused a glut of permits on the market.
President Obama’s budget proposal calls for significant revenue from cap-and-trade auctions.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
The next to last paragraph, as is often the case in articles like this, mistakenly conflates the issue of the level of the cap with the issue of how the allowances are allocated. It is time for reporters to learn to get this straight. PHase I of the EUETS has been criticized for 2 different things. First, the cap was set too high, which is why the price collapsed. Second, the allowances were given away rather than sold, which transferred a large chunk of wealth to the shareholders of power companies (and gave up some possible efficiency gains). These are two separate issues. The glut did not result from the decision to allocate the allowances for free. It occurred because there were too many allowances relative to the demand. If anything, auctioning allowances would have made the glut worse by resulting in the shut down of some marginal generators.
Bill Shobe | March 6th, 2009
So one just has to wonder if the “revenue” from this cap and trade program will ever payback the $13.5 Billion LOSS President Obama and Secretary Chu just handed the nation by stopping the use of Yucca Mountain as a storage site for nuclear waste and effectively eliminating the last hope of a renewed clean-energy future from advanced nuclear power plants.
Jack Pouchet | March 6th, 2009