<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Upping the Ante in Water Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/16/ibm-getting-into-water-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/16/ibm-getting-into-water-management/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloane</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/16/ibm-getting-into-water-management/comment-page-1/#comment-114684</link>
		<dc:creator>sloane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=11814#comment-114684</guid>
		<description>Interesting that IBM is playing a big part in this. A branding blog pointed out that it&#039;s actually not such an odd fit as it seems at first glance--more of a &quot;brand extension&quot; than a brand departure. 

&quot;Basically, in trying to develop a more efficient computer chip, the company recognized that the same thinking that led to a more efficient computer chip could be used to regulate water usage more efficiently on a large scale.  This is a brand in touch with itself and in touch with its history.&quot;

Here&#039;s a link to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/03/15/brand-winners-and-losers-ibm-and-aig.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;full post.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that IBM is playing a big part in this. A branding blog pointed out that it&#8217;s actually not such an odd fit as it seems at first glance&#8211;more of a &#8220;brand extension&#8221; than a brand departure. </p>
<p>&#8220;Basically, in trying to develop a more efficient computer chip, the company recognized that the same thinking that led to a more efficient computer chip could be used to regulate water usage more efficiently on a large scale.  This is a brand in touch with itself and in touch with its history.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/03/15/brand-winners-and-losers-ibm-and-aig.aspx" rel="nofollow">full post.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

