<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: Consuming Nations Should Pay for China&#8217;s Carbon Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/18/china-consuming-nations-should-pay-for-chinas-carbon-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/18/china-consuming-nations-should-pay-for-chinas-carbon-emissions/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Courtland</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/18/china-consuming-nations-should-pay-for-chinas-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-114149</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Courtland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=11965#comment-114149</guid>
		<description>China is correct in suggesting that the West pay for the carbon emissions of the products it buys. Until the true costs of production, including resource extraction, carbon emissions, and disposal solutions, are incorporated into the goods we purchase, our economic system will not find a sustainable balance. Read more in my &quot;We Should All Pay for Carbon Emissions&quot; post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is correct in suggesting that the West pay for the carbon emissions of the products it buys. Until the true costs of production, including resource extraction, carbon emissions, and disposal solutions, are incorporated into the goods we purchase, our economic system will not find a sustainable balance. Read more in my &#8220;We Should All Pay for Carbon Emissions&#8221; post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trip O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/03/18/china-consuming-nations-should-pay-for-chinas-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-114107</link>
		<dc:creator>Trip O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=11965#comment-114107</guid>
		<description>Fine, this is EASY.  Slap all Chinese products with a &quot;Carbon Premium&quot;, just as the nice man suggests.  This will make US products more competitively priced, help re-invigorate U.S. manufacturing, and help promote a cleaner world in the process.  The best part?  It&#039;s not a tariff and nor is it protectionist in spirit and intent, as it does not penalize Chinese products per se, just the carbon intensity of those products.  Therefore, China has an economic incentive to clean house.  Plus, it has been suggested by the Chinese themselves, so they have no reason to complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine, this is EASY.  Slap all Chinese products with a &#8220;Carbon Premium&#8221;, just as the nice man suggests.  This will make US products more competitively priced, help re-invigorate U.S. manufacturing, and help promote a cleaner world in the process.  The best part?  It&#8217;s not a tariff and nor is it protectionist in spirit and intent, as it does not penalize Chinese products per se, just the carbon intensity of those products.  Therefore, China has an economic incentive to clean house.  Plus, it has been suggested by the Chinese themselves, so they have no reason to complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

