EPA Issues New Guidance on Environmental Models

April 6, 2009

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a new set of guidances on developing environmental models. This may affect companies evaluating the toxicity of their products, as well as carbon-emitting installations such as manufacturing plants or utilities.

EPA uses environmental models to simulate the impact of pollutants and to estimate pollution’s effect on public health and the environment. Environmental models also are used to compare the costs and benefits of alternative policies or procedures.

The new guidance (PDF) provides more transparency about EPA’s process, and how it applies environmental models once an environmental issue has been identified. It was prepared by EPA’s Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling.

Using white papers, the National Research Council’s Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making and peer-reviewed literature, the EPA has identified an approach that accounts for model development, evaluation and application.

According to EPA, the model development and evaluation processes “conform to protocols or standards that help ensure the utility, scientific soundness, and defensibility of the models and their outputs for decision making.” This is to ensure a better understanding of the process for companies whose products or projects are subject to EPA review.

The guidance details EPA’s position on best practices, transparency, corroboration, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis.

EPA says that that model developers and users should:

subject their model to credible, objective peer review;
assess the quality of the data they use;
corroborate their model by evaluating the degree to which it corresponds to the system being modeled;
perform sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. According to EPA, sensitivity analysis evaluates the effect of changes in input values or assumptions on a model’s results. Uncertainty analysis investigates the effects of lack of knowledge and other potential sources of error in the model.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader