April 7, 2009

The Greenest Building is the One You Don’t Build

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

With the passing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan, $6.7 billion has been allocated for renovations and repairs to federal buildings, including at least $6 billion focused on increasing energy efficiency and conservation.

These provisions mark a critical shift in the way we think about green buildings: existing buildings – not just new buildings – are critical to a low-carbon economy. In fact, the greenest building is the one you don’t build.

Consider that 95 percent of our building stock remains static year to year, and that most existing buildings are startlingly inefficient in their energy use, and you’ll understand the immense green opportunity presented by existing buildings; they offer the single-greatest opportunity to improve energy efficiency and improve profits across an organization.

More than just transforming our approach to buildings themselves, the stimulus bill is revolutionizing the way organizations must report on their environmental projects, particularly on how they use government funds. In order to secure stimulus funds, organizations have to prove that they will use the money wisely.

For example, contracts must be fixed-price to the greatest extent possible, and they must be secured through a competitive bidding process. In addition, every financial step of the project must be documented in a way that is easily auditable.

With these standards for accountability and transparency, using an Excel spreadsheet is no longer sufficient – organizations need to turn to new technologies with bid-tracking capabilities, auditing tools, and other project management features that can streamline the process of controlling the budget and reporting on it.

While many organizations will struggle with these legislative measures, the prepared ones understand the need for enterprise-class software to manage their building efficiency projects and report transparently on the ROI from these projects.

In addition, reporting standards now focus primarily on financial transparency and accountability, but environmental reporting requirements are not far behind.

We will likely see a cap-and-trade model in the United States for limiting carbon emissions in order to reach a low-carbon economy. In fact, Obama has already stated that he will implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050, and we can expect incremental changes leading up to that goal.

In a low-carbon economy, organizations must report their carbon emissions – including those from their buildings – and they need to put the right systems in place now. Technology is the key to those systems. For example, technologies exist today that help organizations measure, manage, and reduce their environmental impact and report on every detail of their improvements so the public knows how funds are being spent.

Organizations need to evaluate their technology strategies now in order to be in the right position to receive stimulus funds, use them wisely, meet financial reporting mandates, and prepare for near-term environmental legislation.

George Ahn is the president and CEO of TRIRIGA Inc., a leader in integrated workplace management solutions.  The company’s TREES software helps businesses measure, manage and reduce the environmental impact of their real estate portfolios.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

George – You are spot on about the incredible opportunity the stimulus package offers to dramatically improve the energy efficiency of existing buildings – and about the need for transparency and accountability in spending stimulus dollars. One suggestion: performance contracting is an excellent way to accomplish this. Energy efficiency improvements are paid for with the guaranteed savings they generate in lower utility costs and in operational efficiencies. The savings can also be used to offset the initial cost of installing solar panels or other renewable energy systems. Performance contracting needs to be in every organization’s toolkit when it comes to funding energy efficiency improvements with transparency and accountability.

George – Nice title! It seems my comments to your 9/9/08 article about not building as the greenest building strategy are taking root. Unfortunately I don’t see the correlation between the title of this article and its body.

The concept of not building more buildings as the greenest development strategy is based on underutilized space caused by portfolio strategies and space planning protocols that do not address today’s nature of work. The result is vacant office space. 50% – 70% of assigned office space is vacant at any point in time. This means that we are operating buildings as though they are at full capacity when, in fact, they are at 30% – 50% capacity.

Improving new and existing building performance is important. It’s just not the first step in developing a cost sensitive, self-funding sustainability strategy. Such a strategy needs to include protocols that review vision, services, policies, processes, and practices in conjunction with real estate portfolio strategies and space planning.

A holistic approach focused on the 3R’s beginning with Reduce has direct impact on ROI. For example, improving portfolio space utilization provides an opportunity to consolidate the portfolio keeping higher performing building, shed lower performing buildings thus reducing the capital and operating costs, improving organizational effectiveness.

This approach also amplifies reduction in energy demand beyond what can be gained by improving building energy efficiency alone.

That being said, I find your comments aligned with mainstream thinking and second Paul’s observations. I would also point out that while the EECB grant program drives administrative transparency, energy efficiency, and consumption reduction, its emphasis is on technological solutions versus low cost high impact solutions such as behavioral, policy, process, and practice changes.

Another data point supporting your position regarding the need to act now is the upcoming EPA rule on mandatory CO2 emissions reporting. While the current draft is focused on large emitters, there is discussion about including consumption data from sectors with large demand profiles. Whether this provision is included in the final version of this rule is yet to be seen. Regardless of the outcome, we can expect some dramatic changes to the supplier-consumer engagement model.

Does this ARRA include private sector?

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."

JONES Bernard on SunPower Tops List of Best Solar Panel Manufacturers
"I am a adviser & installer of solar system, heating &..."