April 22, 2009
Sustainable Practices in Place at 70% of U.S. Farms

Rabobank has released its sustainable agriculture survey that finds that nearly 70 percent of the U.S. farmers and ranchers have taken steps toward implementing sustainable agricultural practices.
According to Rabobank Farm & Ranch Survey, three out of every four U.S. farmers are aware of sustainable practices, and most have used direct seeding, minimized the use of chemicals or employed crop rotation. The survey targeted farmers who own or operate a farm grossing $250,000 or more in one of three U.S. census regions: Midwest, South and West.
The survey finds that farmers and ranchers in California use alternative energy sources, and the reduction of energy use is more prevalent in the West (45 percent) compared to North Central region (29 percent).
A growing number of California growers and processors are using the sun to help power their operations. Wineries such as Constellation Wines, Frog’s Leap, Foster’s Wine Estates, Jarvis and Robert Keenan, have installed solar systems.
There are regional differences. The survey reveals that in the North Central and South regions, higher-revenue farms (more than $1 million annually) have taken steps toward sustainable agriculture (North Central: 89 percent vs. 67 percent of lower-revenue farms; South: 97 percent vs. 65 percent lower-revenue farms). However in the West, more lower-revenue farms have moved toward sustainable agriculture (74 percent vs. 51 percent for farms with revenues exceeding $1 million).
Direct seeding is more prevalent in the South and North Central (64 percent and 61 percent respectively vs. 44 percent in the West). It is also more prevalent among large acreage farms (75 percent for 1,000 acres or more vs. 52 percent for less than 1,000 acres).
To leverage their eco-friendly operations, a recent report indicates that farmers must focus more on communicating their story of sustainable agriculture if they want consumers to compensate them for their conservation efforts.
Another report reveals that reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is a trend in the U.S. dairy industry, which aims to cut by 25 percent annual GHG emissions related to the production of fluid milk by 2020.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/25/2009
- 11/24/2009
- 11/23/2009
- U.S. Solar Demand Prompts Domestic Production
- Sobeys Aims to Reduce GHG Emissions 15% by 2013
- Government Intervention Required to Drive “Green” Technology
- NREL: State Incentives Crucial to Renewable Energy Growth
- Australia Considers E-Waste Law
- Artic Expedition Investigates Climate Change, Alternative Fuel
- Construction Effluent Rule May Cost $1B Annually
- Germany, UK Ramp Up Solar Efforts
- 62% of Firms Assign Environmental Team for Green Goals
- McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
- Around the Web – Climate Risk, GHG Reporting, Al Gore, U.S. Chamber
- NY Acura Dealer Adds Solar
- Obama May Set Provisional GHG Reduction Targets at Copenhagen
- Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
- Wind Power Investments Grow in North America
- Sanyo Selling Solar Eco-homes
- WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
- CH2M Hill Cuts Paper Use by 21% from 2006 to 2008
- Kraft Rolls Up 50M Miles Saved Through Transportation Efficiency
- Construction Firm Adding Wind, Solar to Demonstrate Possibilities to Customers
- Retrofitted Exit Signs Can Save Up to 90% in Energy Costs
- Electronics Boom, E-Cycling Lags
- Around the Web – Genan, CO Ski Resorts, Sainsbury, MillerCoors
- Replenish Energy Wins Cleantech Open Expo’s Global Ideas Award
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Jetset1 on Energy-Savings Claims Don’t Add Up for Microsoft’s Windows 7
"This article is wrong. If your PC is less than a few years old,..."
Iain on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"Now if only their food was healthy and nutritious."
Phil on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"After reading all the comments it seems obvious, to me, that the individuals populating..."
Marc Hudson on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"where will the stone be mined from- under what labor rights conditions? Will the..."
Clyde on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"This just shows all the Global Warming freaks out there are a bunch of criminals cut from..."
Car Rental Singapore on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"Energy reduction is a good thing. We need to save the..."
Meme Mine on WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
"To the voting public, what the scientists say is irrelevant anymore for if you read..."






Reader Comments
Using genetically modified seeds as a “sustainability” practice???
There is a substantial portion of the sustainability community (including organic labeling standards!!) who would disagree very strongly with that one.
See this wikipedia entry for example:
“In most countries, organic produce may not be genetically modified.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_food
Andy Hultgren | April 22nd, 2009
How is using genetically modified seed sustainable?
Charlotte | April 22nd, 2009
How is using genetically modified seed NOT sustainable?
John | April 28th, 2009
Sorry, I was too curt.
Last I checked, “organic” and “sustainable” were not synonymous. So, a delaration that “organic produce may not be genetically modified” is irrelevant to a discussion of GM sustainability.
John | April 28th, 2009