April 22, 2009

Sustainable Practices in Place at 70% of U.S. Farms

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Rabobank has released its sustainable agriculture survey that finds that nearly 70 percent of the U.S. farmers and ranchers have taken steps toward implementing sustainable agricultural practices.

According to Rabobank Farm & Ranch Survey, three out of every four U.S. farmers are aware of sustainable practices, and most have used direct seeding, minimized the use of chemicals or employed crop rotation. The survey targeted farmers who own or operate a farm grossing $250,000 or more in one of three U.S. census regions: Midwest, South and West.

The survey finds that farmers and ranchers in California use alternative energy sources, and the reduction of energy use is more prevalent in the West (45 percent) compared to North Central region (29 percent).

A growing number of California growers and processors are using the sun to help power their operations. Wineries such as Constellation Wines, Frog’s Leap, Foster’s Wine Estates, Jarvis and Robert Keenan, have installed solar systems.

There are regional differences. The survey reveals that in the North Central and South regions, higher-revenue farms (more than $1 million annually) have taken steps toward sustainable agriculture (North Central: 89 percent vs. 67 percent of lower-revenue farms; South: 97 percent vs. 65 percent lower-revenue farms). However in the West, more lower-revenue farms have moved toward sustainable agriculture (74 percent vs. 51 percent for farms with revenues exceeding $1 million).

Direct seeding is more prevalent in the South and North Central (64 percent and 61 percent respectively vs. 44 percent in the West). It is also more prevalent among large acreage farms (75 percent for 1,000 acres or more vs. 52 percent for less than 1,000 acres).

To leverage their eco-friendly operations, a recent report indicates that farmers must focus more on communicating their story of sustainable agriculture if they want consumers to compensate them for their conservation efforts.

Another report reveals that reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is a trend in the U.S. dairy industry, which aims to cut by 25 percent annual GHG emissions related to the production of fluid milk by 2020.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Using genetically modified seeds as a “sustainability” practice???

There is a substantial portion of the sustainability community (including organic labeling standards!!) who would disagree very strongly with that one.

See this wikipedia entry for example:
“In most countries, organic produce may not be genetically modified.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_food

How is using genetically modified seed sustainable?

How is using genetically modified seed NOT sustainable?

Sorry, I was too curt.

Last I checked, “organic” and “sustainable” were not synonymous. So, a delaration that “organic produce may not be genetically modified” is irrelevant to a discussion of GM sustainability.

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/24/2009
  • 11/23/2009
  • 11/20/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Meme Mine on WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
"To the voting public, what the scientists say is irrelevant anymore for if you read..."

john on Electronics Boom, E-Cycling Lags
"When we fail to get the word out about e-cycling, we fail our consumers and our industry- I second..."

Btok on Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
"http://www.infowars.com/dr-tim -ball-on-the-significance-o..."

ruffie on Wind Power Investments Grow in North America
"Anyone with any knowledge of the energy business in Canada knows that the majority of smart..."

Rod Johnson on Stimulus Package Delivers $2.4 Billion for Electric Vehicle Projects
"Will this stimulus be extended to other electric utility vehicles?"

James Beddingfield on Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests
"Another great thing about an ocean-based carbon sink is that it can’t..."