<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Pushes Through Low-Carbon Fuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/04/24/california-pushes-through-low-carbon-fuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/04/24/california-pushes-through-low-carbon-fuels/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:02:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thegreenestcpa</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/04/24/california-pushes-through-low-carbon-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-121547</link>
		<dc:creator>thegreenestcpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=13896#comment-121547</guid>
		<description>I am so thankful that we made the right decision and are considering all aspects of alternative fuels before just going ahead with something.  I agree with Jeff that solar and wind power is best, but think that our alt-energy future will be comprised of many different ways to (hopefully) get us out of this mess quickly.  I just hope that the lobbiests don&#039;t get their way - I can&#039;t believe the ethanol producers say they are being &quot;targeted&quot; - they don&#039;t have the best product!  It&#039;s more harmful, obviously, to clear rain forests to produce biofuels.  If we didn&#039;t think about everything from all angles first, humans will not survive on this planet.  As Bill Mahr said this week - &quot;we&#039;re all dead, but business is good?&quot;  People are rediculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so thankful that we made the right decision and are considering all aspects of alternative fuels before just going ahead with something.  I agree with Jeff that solar and wind power is best, but think that our alt-energy future will be comprised of many different ways to (hopefully) get us out of this mess quickly.  I just hope that the lobbiests don&#8217;t get their way &#8211; I can&#8217;t believe the ethanol producers say they are being &#8220;targeted&#8221; &#8211; they don&#8217;t have the best product!  It&#8217;s more harmful, obviously, to clear rain forests to produce biofuels.  If we didn&#8217;t think about everything from all angles first, humans will not survive on this planet.  As Bill Mahr said this week &#8211; &#8220;we&#8217;re all dead, but business is good?&#8221;  People are rediculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/04/24/california-pushes-through-low-carbon-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-121235</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=13896#comment-121235</guid>
		<description>Burning gases are bad. Any kind of gas. No Burning. Solar electric home and electric drive car is good. Drive electric, make making electricity cleaner and cleaner is good.
OK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burning gases are bad. Any kind of gas. No Burning. Solar electric home and electric drive car is good. Drive electric, make making electricity cleaner and cleaner is good.<br />
OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
