<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electric City Bus Exceeds 21 MPG Equivalent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/06/electric-city-bus-exceeds-21-mpg-equivalent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/06/electric-city-bus-exceeds-21-mpg-equivalent/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/06/electric-city-bus-exceeds-21-mpg-equivalent/comment-page-1/#comment-124752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=14545#comment-124752</guid>
		<description>This is awesome and I am all for it, but I wish people would realize it makes no sense to state what the gas (or in this case diesel) equivelent mpg is if they don&#039;t give the actual mpg when running on those fuels and how is the equivilent calculated (by cost of fuel vs elevctricity or energy of electricity used versus potential energy in fuel used etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome and I am all for it, but I wish people would realize it makes no sense to state what the gas (or in this case diesel) equivelent mpg is if they don&#8217;t give the actual mpg when running on those fuels and how is the equivilent calculated (by cost of fuel vs elevctricity or energy of electricity used versus potential energy in fuel used etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

