<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Final Budget Calls for 100% Auction of Carbon Permits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:47:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ima</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/comment-page-1/#comment-125100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=14698#comment-125100</guid>
		<description>How does anyone know that giving the permits away won&#039;t reduce emissions when it hasn&#039;t been done?  Give the permits away first to see if in fact it does result in lower emissions.  If the emissions are not lower, then charge for them. I guess greed doesn&#039;t think like this though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does anyone know that giving the permits away won&#8217;t reduce emissions when it hasn&#8217;t been done?  Give the permits away first to see if in fact it does result in lower emissions.  If the emissions are not lower, then charge for them. I guess greed doesn&#8217;t think like this though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/comment-page-1/#comment-124648</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=14698#comment-124648</guid>
		<description>The main problem is that cap and trade will be paid for by the consumer.  All costs will be passed on to the consumer and the majority of citizens are not willing to pay energy bills that double or triple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem is that cap and trade will be paid for by the consumer.  All costs will be passed on to the consumer and the majority of citizens are not willing to pay energy bills that double or triple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newphase75</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/comment-page-1/#comment-124454</link>
		<dc:creator>newphase75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=14698#comment-124454</guid>
		<description>ah, if only assigning cap and trade credits to businesses were enough to make them stick to it... what a world it would be, Ima. I doubt we&#039;d even be talking about this now, it wouldn&#039;t have been necessary. The only way anyone is going to care about carbon emissions or any other unwanted end is to charge them for it. THAT is what they meant. I do think that this is overreaching and possibly (but not definitively) punishing the wrong people, but severe recessions call for cuts for everyone--the money has to come from somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, if only assigning cap and trade credits to businesses were enough to make them stick to it&#8230; what a world it would be, Ima. I doubt we&#8217;d even be talking about this now, it wouldn&#8217;t have been necessary. The only way anyone is going to care about carbon emissions or any other unwanted end is to charge them for it. THAT is what they meant. I do think that this is overreaching and possibly (but not definitively) punishing the wrong people, but severe recessions call for cuts for everyone&#8211;the money has to come from somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ima</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/08/obamas-final-budget-calls-for-100-auction-of-carbon-permits/comment-page-1/#comment-124417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=14698#comment-124417</guid>
		<description>&quot;the main point of cap and trade was to force lower emissions, not raise money.&quot; If that is the truth, then give the permits away!  Point taken Mr. President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the main point of cap and trade was to force lower emissions, not raise money.&#8221; If that is the truth, then give the permits away!  Point taken Mr. President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
