May 13, 2009
Green Costs Create Roadblock to LEED Certification
While many developers are working towards sustainable building practices, some are not seeking the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification because of the cost.
John Zinner, a Santa Monica, California-based LEED project manager, told the Santa Monica Daily Press, that soft costs — the design process — of going for certification could range roughly from $40,000 to $200,000, depending on the size of the project.
As an example, Community Corporation of Santa Monica (CCSM), a local developer of affordable housing, owns approximately 80 properties in the city, a combination of apartment rehabilitation and newly constructed complexes and is a supporter of sustainable design; however, only one of its projects is LEED certified, reports the Santa Monica News.
Joan Ling, the executive director of CCSM, said it doesn’t seek LEED certification for new construction because of the cost, although it’s committed to doing every project at LEED silver level equivalent or above. She estimates the additional cost at about $100,000 for certification per project.
According to the article, there are more than a dozen LEED-certified projects in Santa Monica, including The Ambrose Hotel, Public Safety Facility, Civic Center Parking Garage and two buildings on the Lantana media campus, as well as a series of other developments that could qualify for certification.
LEED certification costs breakdown as follows, according to the article:
- Project registration fee: $450 for members and $600 for non-members.
- Certification fee based on the size of the project and square footage: $1,750 to $17,500 for members to $2,250 to $22,500 for non-members.
- Commissioning agent: Starts at about $15,000.
In addition there are extra costs which may include a consultant to help navigate the applicant through the certification process, reports the newspaper.
Yet owners of commercial buildings may be able to charge higher rents based on their building’s status. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) studied the financial performance of “green” office buildings in the United States, finding that a commercial building with an environmental certification will rent for about three percent more per square foot with the difference in effective rent estimated at about six percent per square foot. The increment to the selling price may be as much as 16 percent, according to the study.
Despite the additional cost for environmental certifications, more companies across all industries seek LEED certification and are designing their buildings to meet energy efficiency under the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Designed to Earn the Energy Star” program.
Columbia Credit Union in Vancouver, Wash., for example, recently earned the LEED Gold Certification for its Washougal Branch. Completed in April 2008, the branch is the first LEED Gold Certified financial institution in Clark County, Washington, according to the bank. The savings have been significant. The branch has used about half the gas and electricity and 40 percent less water on average than comparable branches in the first year.
Columbia earned 42 points toward Gold Certification for site selection, energy use, lighting, water and material use, waste management, air quality and innovation in design. It also achieved a 75 percent reduction in construction waste.
Green features include an omni-directional skylight, a cistern for rainwater collection, porous concrete, FSC certified lumber, corn fiber work station panels, and guest chairs made from recycled seat belts.
According to UK’s Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), architects and designers can make a difference in reducing waste through their design decisions. WRAP has launched an International Open Ideas Competition to explore and develop the principles outlined in its Designing out Waste guide.
In addition to the environmental benefits, some companies can also realize financial gains through certification. According to a recent study by The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, which evaluates the financial benefits of investing in green buildings that meet LEED and/or Energy Star requirements, a commercial building with an environmental certification will rent for about three percent more per square foot with the difference in effective rent estimated at about six percent per square foot. The increment to the selling price may be as much as 16 percent, according to the study.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."





Reader Comments
100k additional cost for certification? on what a 10 million project?absent a gov standard thanks to bush and chaney the private sector has stepped up with green certification costs and ratings…for what free?
with real estate down 50% because of the financial sector that builds to convential construction and costs?
this is why we now have a lowering of the green bar by the nahb..for this exact reason.the cost…..and now what do we have? many competing certifications..because of the failure of bush/chaney.
and if any idiot anywhere had one brain cell in there head…sustainability is going to be the next mandate for the corporation the people want it.this is reason enough to certify green. never mind higher rents,lower
water costs,lower energy costs,15% improvement in productivity,market differenator,lower vocs, i could go on and on.
sustainable guy | May 14th, 2009
Although LEED certification is a little expensive now, its benefits will absolutely pay off in the end. LEED certification is catching on quickly in the building industry; LEED certification will soon become second-nature. As that happens, the price should go down a bit.
Lesley LEEDs | July 15th, 2009