May 21, 2009
Renewable Energy Standard May Save $200B In Annual Energy
Energy efficiency and renewable energy standards could save U.S. consumers $200 billion a year by 2030.
There also is an equal opportunity for the commercial and industrial sectors to save money by the U.S. adopting more aggressive renewable energy measures, panelists said at a May 21 press conference from the Consumer Federation of America.
Medium and large-sized companies can adopt improvements in building shells, ventilation, lighting and more efficient heating and cooling, said Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America.
“The potential for efficiency gains are pretty evenly distributed across the commercial, residential and industrial sectors,” he said. “Building codes and efficiency standards can move us in the right direction.”
Improved lighting is where companies can get the biggest bang for their buck, said Suzanne Watson, Policy Director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
“Air and filtration are among the biggest areas of losses. Variable speed motors are an often-overlooked method. An energy audit is the first step,” Watson said.
The Consumer Federation of America, along with Environment America, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy and the Energy Future Coalition, are calling for more action from Congress on renewable energy. The groups are part of the Campaign for an Energy Efficient America.
“Utilities prefer to build centralized power plants and they have resisted renewable energy for years. That’s why we need the renewable energy standard,” said Mark Cooper, Director of Research at the Consumer Federation of America.
“With cap-and-trade, we need stronger renewable energy standards, not weaker ones, which industry wants,” Cooper said.
Supply curve of low-carbon options demonstrates a possibility to save consumers $200 billion annually by 2030.
“Less aggressive will still be favorable, but will leave considerable consumer savings on the table,” Cooper said.
In the second decade of a renewable energy standard, there will be a scramble to rapidly ramp up renewable energy sources, instead of having renewables adopted now, he said.
“A renewable energy standard needs to be part of U.S. policy, with our without climate legislation,” he said.
With House and Senate committees marking up legislation on energy, now is the time to strive for more, not less, renewable energy requirements, Sargent said.
A national renewable industry standard calling for 25 percent of energy from renewables by 2025, as called a Senate bill sponsored by Tom Udall (D-N.M.), would lower electricity and gas bills by 64 percent, resulting in savings of $75 a month, Sargent said.
“To deliver on the promise of clean energy and the jobs that come with it, we have to demand that clean energy is put front and center. Big oil, coal and nuclear are mounting big campaigns to keep their strangleholds on U.S. energy production, however,” Sargent said.
Easily implementable energy efficiency improvements can reduce electricity consumption by 30 percent, Watson said.
“Efficiency is so cheap, relative to any fuel source,” Watson said. “It’s the only resource that can actually reduce a customers energy usage, producing savings year after year.”
New technologies are needed to meet climate and emissions goals, she said, although businesses can easily adopt compact fluorescent light bulbs and improved insulation.
Energy efficiency measures alone can reduce carbon emissions by 260 million metric tons annually, she said.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
That is why it absolutely makes sense to invest in renewable energy!
Sara Simpson | May 21st, 2009
The headline and most of the text of this article talks about renewable energy, but the savings touted here, I believe, is really from the energy EFFICIENCY. The time may come when renewable energy is cheaper than coal, but certainly not in the near term. It’s going to be politically difficult to raise the cost of fossil fuel electricity by pricing carbon that high. The renewable cost curve will come down, but how fast? Why is it so tough for industry and the media to put efficiency arguments up front?
Mike Wapner | May 22nd, 2009