May 21, 2009
Renewable Energy Standard May Save $200B In Annual Energy
Energy efficiency and renewable energy standards could save U.S. consumers $200 billion a year by 2030.
There also is an equal opportunity for the commercial and industrial sectors to save money by the U.S. adopting more aggressive renewable energy measures, panelists said at a May 21 press conference from the Consumer Federation of America.
Medium and large-sized companies can adopt improvements in building shells, ventilation, lighting and more efficient heating and cooling, said Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America.
“The potential for efficiency gains are pretty evenly distributed across the commercial, residential and industrial sectors,” he said. “Building codes and efficiency standards can move us in the right direction.”
Improved lighting is where companies can get the biggest bang for their buck, said Suzanne Watson, Policy Director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
“Air and filtration are among the biggest areas of losses. Variable speed motors are an often-overlooked method. An energy audit is the first step,” Watson said.
The Consumer Federation of America, along with Environment America, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy and the Energy Future Coalition, are calling for more action from Congress on renewable energy. The groups are part of the Campaign for an Energy Efficient America.
“Utilities prefer to build centralized power plants and they have resisted renewable energy for years. That’s why we need the renewable energy standard,” said Mark Cooper, Director of Research at the Consumer Federation of America.
“With cap-and-trade, we need stronger renewable energy standards, not weaker ones, which industry wants,” Cooper said.
Supply curve of low-carbon options demonstrates a possibility to save consumers $200 billion annually by 2030.
“Less aggressive will still be favorable, but will leave considerable consumer savings on the table,” Cooper said.
In the second decade of a renewable energy standard, there will be a scramble to rapidly ramp up renewable energy sources, instead of having renewables adopted now, he said.
“A renewable energy standard needs to be part of U.S. policy, with our without climate legislation,” he said.
With House and Senate committees marking up legislation on energy, now is the time to strive for more, not less, renewable energy requirements, Sargent said.
A national renewable industry standard calling for 25 percent of energy from renewables by 2025, as called a Senate bill sponsored by Tom Udall (D-N.M.), would lower electricity and gas bills by 64 percent, resulting in savings of $75 a month, Sargent said.
“To deliver on the promise of clean energy and the jobs that come with it, we have to demand that clean energy is put front and center. Big oil, coal and nuclear are mounting big campaigns to keep their strangleholds on U.S. energy production, however,” Sargent said.
Easily implementable energy efficiency improvements can reduce electricity consumption by 30 percent, Watson said.
“Efficiency is so cheap, relative to any fuel source,” Watson said. “It’s the only resource that can actually reduce a customers energy usage, producing savings year after year.”
New technologies are needed to meet climate and emissions goals, she said, although businesses can easily adopt compact fluorescent light bulbs and improved insulation.
Energy efficiency measures alone can reduce carbon emissions by 260 million metric tons annually, she said.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."




Reader Comments
That is why it absolutely makes sense to invest in renewable energy!
Sara Simpson | May 21st, 2009
The headline and most of the text of this article talks about renewable energy, but the savings touted here, I believe, is really from the energy EFFICIENCY. The time may come when renewable energy is cheaper than coal, but certainly not in the near term. It’s going to be politically difficult to raise the cost of fossil fuel electricity by pricing carbon that high. The renewable cost curve will come down, but how fast? Why is it so tough for industry and the media to put efficiency arguments up front?
Mike Wapner | May 22nd, 2009