May 21, 2009

Renewable Energy Standard May Save $200B In Annual Energy

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Energy efficiency and renewable energy standards could save U.S. consumers $200 billion a year by 2030.

There also is an equal opportunity for the commercial and industrial sectors to save money by the U.S. adopting more aggressive renewable energy measures, panelists said at a May 21 press conference from the Consumer Federation of America.

Medium and large-sized companies can adopt improvements in building shells, ventilation, lighting and more efficient heating and cooling, said Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America.

“The potential for efficiency gains are pretty evenly distributed across the commercial, residential and industrial sectors,” he said. “Building codes and efficiency standards can move us in the right direction.”

Improved lighting is where companies can get the biggest bang for their buck, said Suzanne Watson, Policy Director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

“Air and filtration are among the biggest areas of losses. Variable speed motors are an often-overlooked method. An energy audit is the first step,” Watson said.

The Consumer Federation of America, along with Environment America, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy and the Energy Future Coalition, are calling for more action from Congress on renewable energy. The groups are part of the Campaign for an Energy Efficient America.

“Utilities prefer to build centralized power plants and they have resisted renewable energy for years. That’s why we need the renewable energy standard,” said Mark Cooper, Director of Research at the Consumer Federation of America.

“With cap-and-trade, we need stronger renewable energy standards, not weaker ones, which industry wants,” Cooper said.

Supply curve of low-carbon options demonstrates a possibility to save consumers $200 billion annually by 2030.

“Less aggressive will still be favorable, but will leave considerable consumer savings on the table,” Cooper said.

In the second decade of a renewable energy standard, there will be a scramble to rapidly ramp up renewable energy sources, instead of having renewables adopted now, he said.

“A renewable energy standard needs to be part of U.S. policy, with our without climate legislation,” he said.

With House and Senate committees marking up legislation on energy, now is the time to strive for more, not less, renewable energy requirements, Sargent said.

A national renewable industry standard calling for 25 percent of energy from renewables by 2025, as called a Senate bill sponsored by Tom Udall (D-N.M.), would lower electricity and gas bills by 64 percent, resulting in savings of $75 a month, Sargent said.

“To deliver on the promise of clean energy and the jobs that come with it, we have to demand that clean energy is put front and center. Big oil, coal and nuclear are mounting big campaigns to keep their strangleholds on U.S. energy production, however,” Sargent said.

Easily implementable energy efficiency improvements can reduce electricity consumption by 30 percent, Watson said.

“Efficiency is so cheap, relative to any fuel source,” Watson said. “It’s the only resource that can actually reduce a customers energy usage, producing savings year after year.”

New technologies are needed to meet climate and emissions goals, she said, although businesses can easily adopt compact fluorescent light bulbs and improved insulation.

Energy efficiency measures alone can reduce carbon emissions by 260 million metric tons annually, she said.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

That is why it absolutely makes sense to invest in renewable energy!

The headline and most of the text of this article talks about renewable energy, but the savings touted here, I believe, is really from the energy EFFICIENCY. The time may come when renewable energy is cheaper than coal, but certainly not in the near term. It’s going to be politically difficult to raise the cost of fossil fuel electricity by pricing carbon that high. The renewable cost curve will come down, but how fast? Why is it so tough for industry and the media to put efficiency arguments up front?

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."