May 28, 2009
DOE Creates National Carbon Capture Center
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has launched a new National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) to speed up the development and testing of new technologies to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-based power plants, tapping Southern Company Services Inc. to manage and operate the center.
The NCCC will focus national efforts on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through technological innovation, and serve as a test center for emerging carbon capture technologies. The DOE says the center will enable testing and analysis of large-scale research and development to provide data under real operating conditions. The five-year project promises both advancements in technology, and the creation of nearly 170 jobs.
Southern Company will manage the NCCC at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Ala. Established by DOE in cooperation with Southern Company, the PSDF claims a consistent record of testing, development and scale-up of numerous advanced coal-based power generation technologies, many of which are now entering commercial deployment, according to the DOE.
The PSDF facility already has an existing coal gasifier and combustor in place, and offers multiple slip-stream capabilities for testing candidate processes, with the ability to investigate different ranks of coal, biomass, and other fuels. In addition, multiple projects can be tested in parallel with a wide range of testing equipment, and long-term testing is also available to establish the durability and reliability of new technologies.
Technology development will include both pre- and post-combustion CO2 capture. The pre-combustion CO2 capture component will be located at the PSDF, and the post-combustion component will be developed at PlantĀ Gaston, an Alabama Power coal-fueled generating plant adjacent to the PSDF.
Other participants in the NCCC project include American Electric Power, Luminant, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Arch Coal, Peabody Energy, and RioTinto. The center anticipates adding more partners.
EPRI has already begun work on carbon capture technologies. As an example, in January, five electric utilities in the U.S. and Canada joined EPRI to host studies on the impacts of retrofitting carbon capture technology to existing coal-fired power plants. In addition, EPRI, Alsom and We Energies announced their first pilot project in February that uses chilled ammonia to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-fueled power plants.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
My comments do not reflect views or opinions of the company that employs me. The entire idea of carbon capture and sequestration strikes me as a little “off”, lacking in common sense. What happens if a large carbon repository suffers an natural disaster and releases its contents abruptly? Please don’t tel lme this is impossible because in nature nothing is impossible or even unlikely. What consequences does that bring to the environment and to the inhabitants of its vicinity? These questions may smack of medieval thinking to your readers, but they are personal and the public will be asking them even if belatedly. We have a natural system of carbon dioxide balance with plants and this giant scale idea just seems like forgetting the way nature works or simply throwing up our hands to admit this got out of hand. Even with that admission, does sequestration make sense? If it does, someone please explain to me how. Thank you.
peter bowler | June 3rd, 2009