DOE Creates National Carbon Capture Center

May 28, 2009

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has launched a new National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) to speed up the development and testing of new technologies to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-based power plants, tapping Southern Company Services Inc. to manage and operate the center.

The NCCC will focus national efforts on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through technological innovation, and serve as a test center for emerging carbon capture technologies. The DOE says the center will enable testing and analysis of large-scale research and development to provide data under real operating conditions. The five-year project promises both advancements in technology, and the creation of nearly 170 jobs.

Southern Company will manage the NCCC at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Ala. Established by DOE in cooperation with Southern Company, the PSDF claims a consistent record of testing, development and scale-up of numerous advanced coal-based power generation technologies, many of which are now entering commercial deployment, according to the DOE.

The PSDF facility already has an existing coal gasifier and combustor in place, and offers multiple slip-stream capabilities for testing candidate processes, with the ability to investigate different ranks of coal, biomass, and other fuels. In addition, multiple projects can be tested in parallel with a wide range of testing equipment, and long-term testing is also available to establish the durability and reliability of new technologies.

Technology development will include both pre- and post-combustion CO2 capture. The pre-combustion CO2 capture component will be located at the PSDF, and the post-combustion component will be developed at Plant Gaston, an Alabama Power coal-fueled generating plant adjacent to the PSDF.

Other participants in the NCCC project include American Electric Power, Luminant, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Arch Coal, Peabody Energy, and RioTinto. The center anticipates adding more partners.

EPRI has already begun work on carbon capture technologies. As an example, in January, five electric utilities in the U.S. and Canada joined EPRI to host studies on the impacts of retrofitting carbon capture technology to existing coal-fired power plants. In addition, EPRI, Alsom and We Energies announced their first pilot project in February that uses chilled ammonia to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-fueled power plants.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Stay competitive through sustainability.

Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

My comments do not reflect views or opinions of the company that employs me. The entire idea of carbon capture and sequestration strikes me as a little “off”, lacking in common sense. What happens if a large carbon repository suffers an natural disaster and releases its contents abruptly? Please don’t tel lme this is impossible because in nature nothing is impossible or even unlikely. What consequences does that bring to the environment and to the inhabitants of its vicinity? These questions may smack of medieval thinking to your readers, but they are personal and the public will be asking them even if belatedly. We have a natural system of carbon dioxide balance with plants and this giant scale idea just seems like forgetting the way nature works or simply throwing up our hands to admit this got out of hand. Even with that admission, does sequestration make sense? If it does, someone please explain to me how. Thank you.

peter bowler | June 3rd, 2009

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader