May 28, 2009
DOE Creates National Carbon Capture Center
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has launched a new National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) to speed up the development and testing of new technologies to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-based power plants, tapping Southern Company Services Inc. to manage and operate the center.
The NCCC will focus national efforts on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through technological innovation, and serve as a test center for emerging carbon capture technologies. The DOE says the center will enable testing and analysis of large-scale research and development to provide data under real operating conditions. The five-year project promises both advancements in technology, and the creation of nearly 170 jobs.
Southern Company will manage the NCCC at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Ala. Established by DOE in cooperation with Southern Company, the PSDF claims a consistent record of testing, development and scale-up of numerous advanced coal-based power generation technologies, many of which are now entering commercial deployment, according to the DOE.
The PSDF facility already has an existing coal gasifier and combustor in place, and offers multiple slip-stream capabilities for testing candidate processes, with the ability to investigate different ranks of coal, biomass, and other fuels. In addition, multiple projects can be tested in parallel with a wide range of testing equipment, and long-term testing is also available to establish the durability and reliability of new technologies.
Technology development will include both pre- and post-combustion CO2 capture. The pre-combustion CO2 capture component will be located at the PSDF, and the post-combustion component will be developed at PlantĀ Gaston, an Alabama Power coal-fueled generating plant adjacent to the PSDF.
Other participants in the NCCC project include American Electric Power, Luminant, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Arch Coal, Peabody Energy, and RioTinto. The center anticipates adding more partners.
EPRI has already begun work on carbon capture technologies. As an example, in January, five electric utilities in the U.S. and Canada joined EPRI to host studies on the impacts of retrofitting carbon capture technology to existing coal-fired power plants. In addition, EPRI, Alsom and We Energies announced their first pilot project in February that uses chilled ammonia to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-fueled power plants.
Advertisers
Pew Center Conference: Corporate Energy Efficiency
Reduce energy consumption, lower emissions and save money. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 02/09/2010
- 02/08/2010
- 02/05/2010
- WR Grace Targets 20% Energy Intensity Cuts
- As UK Cap and Trade Falters, Government May Prop Up Carbon Prices
- Federal Government Proposes Climate Change Office
- University of Florida Football Complex Uses 25% Less Energy Than Similar Buildings
- 34% of Execs Cite Economy As Impediment to Adopting Sustainability
- Energy Storage Project Aims to Extend Utility of Solar Power
- Ford to Debut Electric Commercial Van
- SF OKs $150M in Property Tax Financing for Energy Efficiency, Renewables
- BNSF Signs Deal for Measuring Energy Efficiency
- Roundup: GE, IBM, Audi ‘Green Police,’ EU Carbon
- Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
- Holiday Inn Express, Bardessono Boast Energy Efficiency, Renewables
- Massachusetts Adds $20M in Solar to 12 Wastewater Plants
- Novo Nordisk Cuts CO2 Emissions by 32%, Water Use by 20%
- Roundup: Dr. Suess Cease-and-Desist, Philips, EPA, Melting Drywall
- Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
- Energy-Efficient Lighting Saves Canadian Tire $6M in 2009
- Pixar Data Center Saves Money Via Cold Aisle Containment
- HVAC Software Helps University of Texas Save $500K a Year
- Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
- Rytec’s Fast Cold Storage Door Helps Save Energy
- Burt’s Bees Decreases Waste to Landfill by 51.5% in 2009
- National RES Would Benefit Southeastern, Manufacturing States
- TBR Evaluates Sustainability Strategies at Dell, CSC, Cisco
- CEO Report Envisions $6 Trillion in Sustainable New Business Opportunities
- IBM ‘Cloud Computing’ Data Center Saves 15% in Energy Costs
- Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
- Collapsible Ocean Shipping Container May Help Reduce Emissions
- To Ensure Future Compliance, Utility Asks for CO2 Limits
- Analyzing Energy-Efficiency Metrics Can Reduce Energy Use in Data Centers
- Goose Island Touts Low-Carbon Brew
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."
Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."
Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."
Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."
Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."
Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"
Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."





Reader Comments
My comments do not reflect views or opinions of the company that employs me. The entire idea of carbon capture and sequestration strikes me as a little “off”, lacking in common sense. What happens if a large carbon repository suffers an natural disaster and releases its contents abruptly? Please don’t tel lme this is impossible because in nature nothing is impossible or even unlikely. What consequences does that bring to the environment and to the inhabitants of its vicinity? These questions may smack of medieval thinking to your readers, but they are personal and the public will be asking them even if belatedly. We have a natural system of carbon dioxide balance with plants and this giant scale idea just seems like forgetting the way nature works or simply throwing up our hands to admit this got out of hand. Even with that admission, does sequestration make sense? If it does, someone please explain to me how. Thank you.
peter bowler | June 3rd, 2009