May 29, 2009

Global Carbon Markets in Discord as Emissions Projections Rise

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Just as the United States warns that global carbon dioxide emissions may rise 39 percent by 2030, there appears to be discord as to whether the U.S. and the European Union will be able to integrate carbon trading markets.

With demand from non-developed countries like China and India using a presumed 73 percent more energy between 2006 and 2030, global energy demand could jump 44 percent, according to reports from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

By 2030, global carbon emissions may rise to 40.4 billion metric tons, compared to 29 billion tons in 2006. Liquid energy demand, including gasoline, would reach 107 million barrels a day by 2030, up from 85 million in 2006.

It should be noted that these projections are based on no legislative changes to cap emission levels or other initiatives to reduce the use of fossil fuels.

Meanwhile, European carbon traders cited the difficulty in alligning the European Union’s emissions trading program with a U.S. cap-and-trade scheme, reports Reuters.

The EU hopes to have a linked global carbon market by 2020. By 2013, the EU would like to see national schemes in all countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), with those linked together by 2015.

The main challenge is in developing systems that are compatible, said David Corregidor, deputy director of environment and climate change at Spanish power utility Endesa.

Additional hurdles include the existence of carbon price caps in the U.S. market, while the EU has none. Also, nations differ on preferred trading units and emissions reductions targets. The bill in the U.S. House calls for 17 percent cuts by 2020, compared to 2005 levels. By 2020, the EU looks to reduce emissions to 21 percent below 2005 levels, however.

To help prevent an extreme rise in emissions from developing nations, it has been floated that rich nations donate a collective $100 billion into a fund to promote the transition to renewable and clean energies in poorer nations, reports Red, Green and Blue.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."