June 17, 2009
Clean Water Restoration Act Gains Detractors
Advocacy groups representing utilities, industry, agriculture and landowners are mounting an offensive against the proposed Clean Water Restoration Act, which is coming up for committee vote in the Senate.
The act, S 787, would broaden regulation of the nation’s waterways, most notably removing the requirement that regulated waterways be “navigable.”
In so doing, the government would essentially be able to regulate everything from standing water in floodplains to creeks that run behind business and residences.
In a letter to Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Barbara Boxer and ranking member James Inhofe, the American Farm Bureau Federation said that the proposed law would “extend to all water — anywhere from farm ponds, to storm water retention basins, to roadside ditches, to desert washes, to streets and gutters, even to a puddle of rainwater,” stated the letter. “For the first time in the 36-year history of the act, activities that have no impact on actual rivers and lakes would be subject to full federal regulation.”
Agricultural operations would be subject to civil lawsuits that currently are not possible, the Farm Bureau stated. If un-navigable waterways are added, businesses and farms would be subject to civil lawsuits from organizations and individuals who don’t like the way the business or farm is using property, reports Wilson County News.
The Heritage Foundation calls the act “troubled waters for property owners.”
The foundation says, “The CWRA is an invitation for federal regulators (or environmental organizations filing lawsuits) to shut down any use of land that they don’t like so long as there is a little water somewhere in the vicinity. If the past is any guide, this law will be used to stop a tremendous amount of economic activity.”
The act has the support of conservation groups including Ducks Unlimited, the National Wildlife Federation, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, and Trout Unlimited, states Ammoland.com.
The Clean Water Restoration Act calls for regulation over “all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams),” including “mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds….”
The act may come up for vote in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee June 18.
The National Center for Public Policy Research has created a Web site with links about the act.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Advertisers
100% Online Lean & Green Supply Chain Courses
Attain proven tools and strategies to boost your career! >>
Trends in Sustainability Performance Management
Take the lead on sustainability. - Take the lead in your industry. >>
Can you be a sustainability leader?
Learn how from one of the world's leading retailers >>
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 09/10/2010
- 09/09/2010
- 09/08/2010
- RGGI CO2 Allowance Auction Price Sinks to Lowest Level
- NAD Wants Seventh Generation to Fix ‘Natural’ Claims
- Report: EU ETS Could Increase Carbon Emissions
- China Rations Power to Meet Energy-Efficiency Targets
- DJSI World Drops Toyota Motor, Shell, UniCredit
- USW Accuses China of Violating Trade Rules
- Amazon, Costco, Xpedx Fail to Make the ‘Green’ Grade
- Roundup – Hyundai, Cisco, Timberland
- Kimberly-Clark Launches Water-Saving Promo
- Fresh & Easy Opens First Store with CO2 Refrigeration
- Eastern Bag & Paper Targets Energy Savings, Carbon Reduction
- Frito-Lay Poised to Launch Largest All-Electric Truck Fleet in North America
- Education’s Unlikely Role in the Water Crisis
- Oracle Board Opposes Sustainability Proposal
- Whole Foods Rolls New Sustainable Packaging Guidelines
- Coca-Cola Gains Insight from Water Footprint Assessments
- Roundup – Home Depot, MeadWestvaco, EPA
- Vestas V112 Turbine Targets Low/Med Wind Speed Sites
- P&G Compacted Powder Detergents Reduce Waste, Water Use
- Global Insurers Want a Role in UN Climate Negotiations
- Hitachi Europe, Müller Dairy to Bring Energy Efficient Data Centers Online
- ABS, SDARI to Test Fuel-Saving Tech for Ships
- ‘EcoAware’ Moms Have Buying Power Worth $1.45 Trillion
- PepsiCo Water Report: Water Efficiency Improves 15+%
- Thales CR Report: Energy Use Down 7%
- How e-Invoicing Can Save a Small Forest
- Roundup – Chevron, RedbirdLED, Chromasun
- Global Energy Efficient Lighting Market to Hit $32.2 Billion by 2015
Charts [ see all ]
White Papers [ see all ]
- Building Sustainability in Hard Times: Integrated EHS Platforms Support Cost Savings
- Get Green Powered and Lower Your Energy Costs
- Eco-Competitiveness: Safeguarding Profitability and the World's Natural Resources
- The Revolution in Warehouse Lighting: LEDs and Intelligent Lighting Systems
- Global Trends In Sustainability Performance Management
- The EPA's Mandatory Reporting Rule
- A Business Framework for Excelling at Enterprise Carbon Management
- What's On Your Sustainability Dashboard?
- 9 Ways to Reduce Energy Costs
Comments and Discussions
gianmarko on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"as for those who claim reduction in electricity consumption, you must have hallucinations...."
gianmarko on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"CFL are a scam. they dont last nearly as much as advertised, in fact, they last less than a..."
Hanach on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"What I don’t like is the fact that the useful life of compact flouros is greatly reduced..."
Eric Youle on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"Hi I swapped over to Compact Flouros some years ago, but am largely phasing them out now...."
Margie C. on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"Way to go ZZZ, you can show them who’s boss. Better stock up while you can! Personally,..."
ZZZ on China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
"I will rev my car at every stoplight in memory of the undemocratic way the authorities took away my..."
Matt Courtland on Education’s Unlikely Role in the Water Crisis
"Wonderful article, Bjorn. I believe that education is the cornerstone of all..."







Reader Comments
From the Great Lakes to Puget Sound, from the Mississippi River to the Everglades, and from Chesapeake Bay to the Colorado – we can only protect the great waters of America if we safeguard the countless streams that feed them and the millions of acres of wetlands that help keep them clean. Perhaps that is why today, the Senate EPW committee rejected the spurious arguments of the powerful polluters cited in your article, and instead voted to restore protections vital to America’s great waters. As its name indicates, the Clean Water Restoration Act does no more than restore the original scope of the Clean Water Act that our nation adopted some 37 years ago – to protect all the waters of the United States.
John Rumpler | June 18th, 2009
John Rumpler is Senior Attorney for Environment America, a network of environmental advocacy organizations in 27 states.
John Rumpler | June 18th, 2009
Just wait until some greens don’t like the puddles in your driveway. lawsuits for everyone!!!!
Just Blaze | June 29th, 2009
Thank you for your article on the CWRA. Here’s how it works: The trust agency for the CWRA (currently USACE & EPA under current CWA) would issue guidance on what would be determined jurisdictional under the new CWRA, and current methods for delineation would be employed in the field. Tying a wetland to a navigable water body would not be a component of the jurisdictional determination, but could be a factor. Important to differentiate stream beds (bounded by ordinary high water marks) and wetlands (boundary determined in the field using delineation techniques). In practice, you’d probably see more isolated wetlands regulated, but under current Significant Nexus Test guidance for streambeds, I doubt that more streams would be regulated under a CWRA because the current SNT guidance is easily broadly applicable. In summary, as far as extent of regulation, you’d see a jurisdictional determinations resembling pre-SWANCC decision (which removed jurisdiction for isolated wetlands) for wetlands and streambed jurisdictions similar to what we have now post Rapanos decision (which provided for the SNT).
Taylor Houston | August 19th, 2009
Who wrote this article and what are his/her credentials
Adam | September 24th, 2009
It may be trite, but there is tremendous truth to the saying “the devil is in the detail.” And I can assure you by and large most lawyers (particularly the great minds) probably spend most of their time obsessing over the fine print.
In the context of the CWRA it may seem silly to be arguing over what it means for water to be “navigable” or not, when the real issue is keeping our water clean. But that particular fine print, and how it is interpreted, has a profound effect on the power of the federal government over the waters of the United States. And thus that fine print has an enormous impact on the lives of the people who are affected by those waters.
The things lawyers obsess about often seem unimportant – and perhaps sometimes they are – but far more often we obsess over them because they have enormous implications to how real people live their lives.
Dan Puroclean | March 3rd, 2010