June 17, 2009
Electronics Recycling Certification May Halt Unethical Practices
In a move to help businesses ensure that they are ethically recycling their obsolete electronics, the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) now offers electronics recyclers and others including asset management and refurbishing operations national certification to the e-Stewards Certification Program developed by the Basel Action Network (BAN).
ANAB, the U.S. accreditation body for management systems, will provide oversight of third-party certification bodies that become accredited to conduct audits and issue certificates of conformance to electronic recyclers that successfully demonstrate they meet the requirements of the e-Stewards Standard.
“The e-Stewards Standard provides a means to respond to the need for responsible disposal of electronics waste, and ANAB’s oversight of the certification program is intended to build confidence and value for consumers,” said Randy Dougherty, ANAB vice president, in a statement.
To apply for ANAB’s e-Stewards accreditation, certification bodies must have an office located in North America and be accredited by ANAB or another national accreditation body recognized by the International Accreditation Forum to provide certification to ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systems.
Certification body auditors also must successfully complete training established by the Basel Action Network prior to performing audits for e-Stewards certification.
The Basel Action Network also is warning consumers to be careful about where they recycle their old TVs following the nationwide conversion from analog to digital TV. They urge consumers to only use qualified e-Steward recyclers that will not export TVs and other electronic waste to developing countries.
Similarly, the Electronics TakeBack Coalition said that too few TV manufacturers have programs to recycle electronics, and that many of the ones that exist are inadequate.
According to BAN, due to a lack of legislation about 80 percent of those companies calling themselves “recyclers” in North America will export old TVs to countries like China, India, or Nigeria where the toxic leaded glass, cadmium, and brominated flame retardants will poison villagers using outdated technologies to recover some of the materials and then dump or burn the rest of the electronic waste.
Allegations of misconduct by BAN recently instigated an investigation by the Environmental Protection Agency into EarthEcycle LLC. The environmental group alleges that the recycler exported hazardous electronics to Korea and Hong Kong instead of properly recycling the electronics.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
In the early times take overs were hostile, using weapons. Later the opposing parties used to simply call you a communist to discredit an organization. Today corporate espionage, discrediting the head of the company and finding any dirt (which is possible with the cleanest of us) are tools used in conjunction with the press to get ahead of the game.
Since the ewaste industry is relatively new and so very controversial along with the regulations being so low, it is easy to impress upon people the negative making it hard to do good and moral business.
We are not giving up, if anything we are more fired up to show people and corporations the value of the waste they are paying companies like ELoop (in our professional opinion)to take away. Also, we were told by ELops own collectors that ELoop sold the ewaste they collected to a company in Canada who sold it to Hong Kong until they made enough capitol to purchase the new warehouse.
Lastly, why would a BAN Esteward need to file the EPA paperwork to sell CRT overseas if they didn’t actually sell overseas? Some info for an investigative reporter. I stand firm on the innocence of our company and our policy to create jobs for our unemployed American here in the U.S. and finding value bringing capitol here to the U.S. instead of charging outrageous fees to dispose of American property that has value. These companies are outright lying and using keywords like toxic to label items that have world trade value to responsible factories and users all over the world.
The EPA will find favor in our dealings and we will retaliate with legal action against those who have intentionally tried to damage our reputation and our business.
Jeff
Jeffrey L Nixon | June 22nd, 2009