June 25, 2009
IP Says Paper is Greener than Computers
International Paper has added a new brochure to its Down to Earth environmental series, “Pixels vs. Paper: Are pixels greener than paper?” which takes the stance that paper is friendlier to the environment than electronic devices.
Some of IP’s key findings in the comparison between paper and computers include:
- The amount of electricity to run a computer for only five months could produce enough paper for the average person to use for an entire year.
- Twenty percent less CO2 is used per year by a person reading a daily printed newspaper versus a person reading web-based news for 30 minutes a day.
- Paper is biodegradable and nearly 60 percent of all paper in the U.S. is recycled.
- Only 18 percent of all electronic devices are currently recycled and e-waste constitutes the single largest waste export in the U.S.
- Paper comes from a renewable and sustainable source — trees, while electronic devices are typically made of plastics and other non-renewable resources and chemicals and metals. IP says every day the paper and forest products industry plants more than three times the number of trees than are harvested.
IP could have a tough sell on its hands. Research from DMNews and Pitney Bowes, for example, has found that 48 percent of the U.S. population believe that mail is half of the content in the nation’s landfills. Mail, according to the report, actually makes up two percent of the nation’s municipal waste.
So while direct marketers and those working in other paper-intensive industries might be convinced on the “paper vs pixels” debate, consumer perception, which, in the case of marketing, dictates whether a company will ultimately choose paper or pixels, could lag behind.
International Paper also has expanded its Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Chain-of-Custody certification to include a majority of its U.S. pulp and paper mills and a number of converting facilities across its businesses. IP says the increase establishes the company as having the largest FSC manufacturing platform across the globe.
IP’s FSC Chain-of-Custody certification worldwide now includes: three coated paperboard mills and its six converting facilities; four pulp operations; six industrial packaging mills; seven printing papers mills and its sheeting operations; and a number of manufacturing facilities associated with its foodservice and Shorewood businesses.
Chain-of-Custody certification guarantees that wood coming from certified and responsibly managed forestlands is tracked throughout the supply chain, from the forest to the consumer.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."






Reader Comments
not a very convincing argument, at least as framed here. What about the resources involved in manufacturing and shipping additional printers? Cartridges? The electricity powering them? This makes it sound like IP expected that we were printing and writing on our computers (literally) instead of paper. It’s a liiiitle more complicated than that…
Daniel Henderson | June 25th, 2009
I cannot help but think that productivity vs energy required is a formula that needs considering. Imagine if we did all the messaging we do today by mail?
Jules | June 26th, 2009
Yes, Daniel, I agree, it is a liiiitle bit more complicated than that, because they’re not just talking about personal desktop printing as you and Jules are suggesting, they’re talking about large-scale printing too: the printing of newspapers, brochures, books, booklets, annual reports etc etc etc, which people are increasingly encouraged to use view online rather than in hard copy format. I think you both need to consider yuor arguments a little more.
Brenda | June 30th, 2009
It all comes down to the fact that people need to be more responsible. Instead of crying about the paper in landfills; start recycling. Stop being lazy and separate your “trash” to recycle. That’s as simple as it gets. If we continue to cut out printed publications, imagine how many jobs you’re cutting out – I used to work as a desktop publisher and my father actually works for International Paper, now I work for the United States Postal Service. Paper is the source of our income. So if people would be more responisble by recycling we can all hold on to our jobs.
Sorry if this is all jumbled up – I’m half asleep with no coffee.
Jen R. | July 22nd, 2009