July 9, 2009
22% of Consumers Don’t Know How to Discern Green Products
In a study of consumer opinions of marketing claims, 22 percent of survey respondents said they have no way of knowing whether a product is green or not, according to research conducted by the Shelton Group.
The EcoPulse survey found that nearly 20 percent of consumers look to the product’s label to determine whether it’s green. Another 15 percent look to the ingredient list.
“People are uncertain what to trust, so there’s almost a ‘buyer beware’ attitude in the market, with consumers feeling they have to rely primarily on what they can read on the label,” said Suzanne Shelton. “Consumers want a trusted source for accreditation, one that is simple to understand.”
Shelton pointed to the Energy Star label as one that consumers trust, because they can see specific numbers on the label.
Consumers don’t like to be misled or betrayed by brands they trust, Shelton said.
When asked what their reaction would be if a company that makes a favorite product and had been advertising itself as “green” received a government fine for failing emissions standards or for polluting a nearby stream, four in ten respondents indicated they would stop buying the product. What’s more, 36 percent would not only stop buying, they’d encourage friends not to buy the product, according to a press release.
More survey results are available here. The survey was conducted in April and May among 1,006 consumers.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."





Reader Comments
I am generally suspicious of studies that conclude a subject is important, particularly when motivated by an organizations that has a vested interest in the subject being important.
So it is my pleasure to independently confirm this result as consistent with the results we are finding at open4energy. We are an open source supplier of information about green technology. We have just published a review of how much energy is used in phantom power, when charging a well known brand of PDA, a BlackBerry.
The results find that 10 times the energy needed for charging is typically wasted leaving the charger plugged in after charging is complete. The full details can be found at http://open4energy.com/forum/mc/nb/phantom_power
But the point we make in support of your findings is this. It seems that most device owners are unaware exactly what phantom power is. With this being the case, it would be impossible for them to assess if a charger was energy efficient as advertised, or not.
We further find that a large portion of information on the internet regarding the subject of energy efficiency in consumer computing devices is simply wrong. It has been written to promote one or other device, usually the a kill a watt (which is stated inaccurate under 60 W) or a smart power strip claiming impossible energy reductions.
Note the new term “vampire power” and not the traditional term of “standby power” as the hype is picked up.
Thank you for this report, and may I add our warning to be diligent on where you get the information you will need to make an informed decision on energy efficiency.
And don’t forget that the best, and FREE, savings method is to “turn it off” when not being used.
Alex | July 10th, 2009