July 27, 2009
UN Approves Ag Carbon Offset Methodology to Cut CO2 Emissions
The United Nations recently approved the broad application of the first agricultural methodology, or biological approach, for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The UN’s announcement coincides with the USDA’s analysis report that shows the economic benefits to agriculture from the U.S. cap-and-trade legislation.
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is part of the Kyoto Protocol, which allows industrialized countries to purchase emission reduction certificates, called Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), from projects that reduce emissions in developing countries that do not have a reduction commitment under the Kyoto Protocol.
The agricultural methodology, which will be used to design projects that eliminate the use of synthetic nitrogen on legumes like soybeans and cowpeas, was developed by Amson Technology LC, a greenhouse-gas-reduction and sustainability consulting firm, Becker Underwood Inc., a leading developer of bio-agronomic and specialty products and Perspectives GmbH, a Point Carbon company, a high-quality greenhouse gas reduction market solutions provider.
“The UN’s decision highlights how agriculture can provide solutions to climate change issues while feeding a growing world population,” said Peg Armstrong-Gustafson, owner and founder, Amson Technology LC.
A recent study from DB Climate Change Advisors finds that the agriculture sector can participate in the mitigation of climate change due to its ability to store and cycle CO2 and to provide potential offset markets for the trading/management of carbon. This can be done through a number of technologies and management practices such as no-till cropland management, planting of perennials and the development of biochar resources, according to the study.
The methodology calls for the use of a unique bacterium to stimulate the creation of nitrogen by the plant for its own use, called biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which eliminates the need for the application of nitrogen fertilizer. According to Amson Technology the production of nitrogen fertilizer is energy intensive and releases significant amounts of CO2.
Amson, Becker and Perspectives will soon begin implementing CDM projects with the unique bacteria from Becker Underwood. The three firms launched the project more than three years ago. The CDM projects will run for up to 21 years and operate under the terms of the methodology for measuring and monitoring the reduction of CO2 emissions.
In the U.S., a sustainable agriculture survey conducted by Rabobank shows that nearly 70 percent of the U.S. farmers and ranchers have taken steps toward implementing sustainable agricultural practices, and dairy farmers are striving to cut 25 percent annual GHG emissions related to the production of fluid milk by 2020.
Earlier this year, the Office of Ecosystem Services and Markets, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, started a program to partner industrial emitters of CO2 with landowners to plant forests or crops to reduce carbon emissions.
In addition, the recently released Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS) allows agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) projects to generate carbon credits that are interchangeable with other carbon credits generated by non-AFOLU activities such as energy and industrial projects.
The UN’s decision coincides with the release of a USDA report that analyzes the impact of the U.S. climate legislation, which reduces greenhouse gases and implements a cap-and-trade program, on the agricultural and forestry industries.
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said the results of a recent USDA economic analysis shows that the economic benefits to agriculture from the cap-and-trade legislation will likely outweigh the costs in the short term, and that the economic benefits from offsets markets will easily outpace increased input costs over the long term.
According to the USDA report, the U.S. climate legislation provides opportunities for farmers and ranchers to receive payments for carbon offsets. EPA’s analysis indicates that in 2020 agricultural lands would supply 70 million tons of CO2e offsets through changes in tillage practices, reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emissions, and tree planting (afforestation), while existing forests would supply an additional 105 million tons of CO2e reductions through enhanced forest management, according to the report.
Vilsack said the House climate bill would increase farm expenses by $700 million, or 0.3 percent, from 2012-18, reported Reuters. However, the report analysis indicates that would be offset by revenue from a carbon offset market, estimated at $1 billion per year from 2015 to 2020 to almost $15-$20 billion in 2040-2050, not accounting for costs of implementing offset practices.
As an example, Vilsack said a Northern Plains wheat producer, for example, might see an increase of $.80 per acre in costs of production by 2020 due to higher fuel prices. Based on a soil carbon sequestration rate of 0.4 tons per acre and a carbon price of $16 per ton, a producer could mitigate those expenses by adopting no-till practices and earning $6.40 per acre.
Though Vilsack admits that climate legislation will impact different landowners in different ways.
EPA administrator Lisa Jackson said offsets would be worth nearly $3 billion a year in 2020 for farms, ranches and forests, reports Reuters.
The report indicates that by 2050, agricultural lands could supply 465 million tons of CO2e reductions and existing forests could supply an additional 178 million tons of CO2e reductions. This could generate gross domestic agricultural and forestry offset revenues of about $1-2 billion per year from 2012-2018, rising to $20 billion per year in 2050, according to EPA analysis.
However, the report does not consider the potential effects of the offsets markets on commodity prices. The removal of cropland and pastureland for afforestation would place upward pressure on crop prices, which would benefit producers of livestock feed but lead to higher livestock input costs and higher producer prices for livestock and milk, according to the study.
In the near term, most of the money would go to people who plant trees to lock carbon in the soil or enroll woodlands as carbon sinks, while relatively small amounts would be generated by changes in tillage or crops, reports Reuters.
Two senators from the Great Plains, Republicans Mike Johanns of Nebraska and Pat Roberts of Kansas, asked Vilsack and Jackson, how much pasture and crop land would shift into trees if a carbon offset market is created, according to Reuters. Roberts said 40 million acres might be converted, reports the news agency.
The EPA estimates U.S. cropland accounts for 6 percent of greenhouse gas emissions but growing vegetation removes 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reports Reuters.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."





Reader Comments
Agriculture is interesting as a carbon offset but certainly presents a number of challenges in the water footprinting arena
Zack Mansdorf | July 27th, 2009
I’m thrilled that the agriculture sector is going to offset. Really I am. I just wish we could start holding people responsible for their carbon footprint the same way we do industries. Offset services exist for all different types of people. It makes it really easy. For example, Belgrave Trust is tailored specifically for the wealthy. I think there’s also one started by Native Americans…
Thing is it’s so easy to make an impact as an individual. Hopefully people start to use these and other services to live carbon neutral
Carly | July 28th, 2009
There are several unmentioned benefits to adoption of no-till farming methods and afforestation that I thought should be mentioned. As carbon is stored in soil, the fertility of that soil typically increases, leading to increased yields. On a larger scale untilled and forested lands have drastically less soil erosion. Soil erosion is a problem for farmers, the fish downstream, and countless other entities. Cheers to progress.
Josiah | July 28th, 2009
I work in BioLogic Agriculture in Australia. We have practical examples of Broad Acre farms increasing SOC each year under continuous cropping. Farmers staying profitable and competitive in the market, increasing the value and capability of their land at the same time. It can be done and it can be done on the billions of tonnes globally sequestered scale if we want to. Australia could play a big role in this and to be frank – our political leadership is looking to what the US does and what comes out of Copenhaagen at the end of this year. Without getting too political I am so glad to read this article, see the momentum building and finally to see the USA coming back to its most powerful role in global leadership. The role of the inspirational leader.
Andrew VanderSluys | July 28th, 2009
Don’t legumes naturally fix nitrogen and therefore isn’t it obvious that you don’t need a Nitrogen based fertilizer for your next crop?
Ierene | August 4th, 2009
I share Irene’s(Aug 4th) surprise. Does it not look like sending coal to Newcastle? If the N-fixing bug were for wheat or rice, it’d be Ok but for a couple of legumes?
Hector Ginzo | August 7th, 2009