July 28, 2009
NYC E-waste Recycling Under Fire as AT&T Ramps Up Own Efforts
As industry groups file suit against a New York City e-waste recycling program, AT&T is ramping up its own wireless recycling initiatives, showing the divergent attitude that is emerging among sellers of electronic devices.
AT&T estimates it will collect roughly 14 million wireless devices for recycling by the end of 2011, which will keep more than 920 tons of primary materials and more than 13 tons of toxic waste out of landfills.
Here are the highlights of AT&T’s e-waste initiative.
- Provides recycling drop-off spots via all 2,000-plus retail locations nationwide, and offers free prepaid shipping labels online at www.att.com/recycle.
- Adds two more ways to help make recycling easy for wireless users via free, prepaid mailing envelopes in stores and online (att.com/recycle).
- Through August 2009, AT&T is working with the American Camp Association (ACA) to share its recycling mission with over 2 million children, tweens, and teens across the U.S.
- Promotes wireless recycling efforts at AT&T-sponsored music and movie festivals through 2010.
- AT&T’s volunteer organization, the AT&T Pioneers, continues community-based recycling drives across the U.S.
- Continues to offer free donation drive toolkits online, including templates for recycling bins and tips for wiping data from old phones before recycling.
While many electronic device manufacturers participate in nationwide recycling efforts, two technology industry groups are challenging New York City’s electronics recycling law, stating it will cost manufacturers, and small businesses, more than $200 million annually.
The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) have filed a legal challenge against a new law in New York City, mandating that manufacturers provide free, door-to-door electronics collection to city residents.
The industry groups said the regulation, which is scheduled to go into effect July 31, 2009, will force hundreds of additional trucks onto city streets, increasing traffic congestion, air and noise pollution, and carbon emissions.
The industry groups said the financial burden of door-to-door collection threatens to force electronics companies out of the New York City marketplace or into bankruptcy.
In addition, the city’s regulations place the entire cost of collecting and recycling old electronics products on manufacturers, including hundreds of U.S. companies whose products are shipped into the city by distributors, said the groups, even if they don’t have a corporate presence in New York City or the infrastructure to provide collection services.
However, businesses received good news in Canada. The Electronics Stewardship Association of British Columbia (ESABC) is revising the Environmental Handling Fees (EHFs) charged on products which were regulated for the launch of the program August 1, 2007. Most charges will be lowered between 20 to 75 percent.
These changes will become effective on August 1, 2009 and are directly related to computer, printer, monitor and TV purchases.
Paid at the point of purchase by both commercial and residential consumers, the EHFs are used by ESABC, a not for profit association, to provide a sustainable industry-led recycling program for end of life electronics for British Columbia.
ESABC said the changes reflect significant decreases of between 20 percent and 75 percent in almost all the EHFs charged on in Phase I products currently accepted by the ESABC program. Only one product category, Display Devices between 30 and 45 inches will see a modest increase in EHF of 6 percent from $30.00 to $31.75. ESABC also added a new EHF of $0.90 on aftermarket sales of keyboards and mice/trackballs.
ESABC has diverted more than 20,000 metric tons of material from British Columbia landfills since the program’s inception, making it one of the most successful recycling programs in North America, according to the nonprofit group.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."






Reader Comments
You missed an excellent opportunity to highlight the fact that the tech and consumer electronics sectors have taken significant steps to facilitate the responsible disposal and reuse of their products. However, they are opposing the New York City ordinance because it places an incredible undue and unfair burden on manufacturers, including even requiring them to incur significant costs to reclaim their competitors’ products. There are far more reasonable alternatives available to NYC and its citizens. The City Council knows that. They need to act responsibly themselves!
JM
JoeMac | July 29th, 2009