August 4, 2009

Is the U.S. Falling Behind in the Race to Clean Tech?

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Increasingly, business executives are starting to worry that the U.S. is losing a prime opportunity to advance the nation’s economy by embracing the clean tech revolution. Instead, China appears poised to take a leadership role.

The U.S. faces a “competitiveness crisis” in the area of “green technology,” wrote John Doerr and Jeff Immelt, in a guest column in the Washington Post. Doerr is a partner in the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Jeff Immelt is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric.

Citing the $1 trillion spent annually on energy in the U.S., Doerr and Immelt opine that, as factions in the U.S. bicker over the role of clean tech and renewables, China “understands the importance of controlling its energy future.”

As a percentage of gross domestic product, China is spending ten times the amount on clean energy as is the U.S., they write:

What do Amazon, eBay, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo have in common? Two things: They are the world’s five leading Internet technology companies, and they are all American. But when it comes to wind power, the most mature of the clean-energy sectors, of the top five manufacturers (Vestas, GE, Gamesa, Enercon and Suzlon) only one is American,” the column continues.

Similarly, the United States is home to only one of the 10 largest solar panel producers in the world and two of the top 10 advanced battery manufacturers. How can we catch up? Not through protectionism or massive government intervention but through the power of good old home-grown innovation.

Others are worried about the message the federal government is sending in a recent spate of communications related to clean tech.

In late July, the Department of Energy sent out form letters to many of the nearly 3,500 research teams and individuals seeking a piece of the $150 million in stimulus funds designated for “transformational” energy technologies, reports the New York Times. The letters (click here for a sample), amounted to a rejection letter, even referring to the applicant as “discouraged.”

The letter states that only about 2 percent of the applications may result in any form of funding.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."