<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualifying for Best Renewable Energy Incentives a Matter of Timing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/08/04/qualifying-for-best-renewable-energy-incentives-a-matter-of-timing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/08/04/qualifying-for-best-renewable-energy-incentives-a-matter-of-timing/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Tofel</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/08/04/qualifying-for-best-renewable-energy-incentives-a-matter-of-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-140060</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=19137#comment-140060</guid>
		<description>Your story is loaded with factual errors. Suggest your check your facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your story is loaded with factual errors. Suggest your check your facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/08/04/qualifying-for-best-renewable-energy-incentives-a-matter-of-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-140023</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=19137#comment-140023</guid>
		<description>A couple of responses:
1. Feed-in tariffs are not designed to pay a &quot;premium&quot;. They are designed to pay the production cost plus a reasonable profit for the renewable energy.  This may or may not be above market - depending on the technology and the time.
2. The eligibility question - for GMCR and all other systems - has not been decided.  The regulators have not made a decision on that question yet.  GMCR still may be able to participate in the Feed-in Tariff.

3. I question if this is really a &quot;setback&quot; for GMCR (who already received plenty of financial incentives for this project) and also the implication that costly &quot;special engineering&quot; is required for PV roof-mounted systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of responses:<br />
1. Feed-in tariffs are not designed to pay a &#8220;premium&#8221;. They are designed to pay the production cost plus a reasonable profit for the renewable energy.  This may or may not be above market &#8211; depending on the technology and the time.<br />
2. The eligibility question &#8211; for GMCR and all other systems &#8211; has not been decided.  The regulators have not made a decision on that question yet.  GMCR still may be able to participate in the Feed-in Tariff.</p>
<p>3. I question if this is really a &#8220;setback&#8221; for GMCR (who already received plenty of financial incentives for this project) and also the implication that costly &#8220;special engineering&#8221; is required for PV roof-mounted systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

