August 13, 2009
ACT Data Center Passes LEED Platinum Test
If there’s one thing the people at ACT know, it’s how to take a test. When it came to making the grade for a new data center, ACT, the national testing organization, became the first organization in the nation to have its data center certified to the platinum level of LEED by the U.S. Green Building Council.
Based in Iowa City, Iowa, ACT administers college-entrance tests to high school students.
The new data center was built to withstand natural disasters, including tornadoes. It has an energy-efficient geothermal system which ACT says is unique among data centers. Traditionally, geothermal power is not compatible with data centers, because of the heat generated and the need to keep the machines cool. In this application, the heat transfer loops are buried in the ground and the remainder of the equipment sets within the tornado resistant facility, according to a press release.
Because of its location, the cooling source is protected from 250 mph wind speed, projectiles and vandalism.
A separate energy efficient system incorporates dry coolers to add redundancy for the primary geothermal loop. In the winter, the dry cooler system will sometimes be more efficient than the ground-source system.
Here are some other facets of the operation:
- Enhanced indoor air quality due to air quality control systems and increased ventilation rates that are more than 30 percent greater than code requirements
- Reduced energy usage from high-performance HVAC systems
- Recycled content in more than 30 percent of the total building materials
- Restored native prairie landscaping on 90 percent of the site, requiring no irrigation
- Renewable materials like cork flooring, cotton-wall insulation, aspen fiber ceiling panels, and agrifiber wood doors
Another building dedicated to education has undergone improvements designed to LEED standards.
A Higher Education Center in Medford, Ore., is being built to obtain LEED platinum, according to the Mail Tribune.
The building is adding a rooftop solar array, funded by $285,000 from the U.S. Department of Education from the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2009, plus $92,000 in renewable energy tax credits from the Energy Trust of Oregon.
The panels will produce 55 kilowatts of energy (71,000 kilowatts a year) and reduce the building’s electricity bill by 10 percent, resulting in a savings, at 7.2 cents a kilowatt, or $5,170 a year, he said. The cost of the project is about $400,000, according to the article, meaning that it would take 77 years for the building to recoup the total costs paid by ACT and taxpayers, based on today’s electricity costs, if the panels or the building were to last that long.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."





Reader Comments
My payback calculations are quite a bit different than those stated. These folks are no dummies. They score LEED points for putting the solar on their facility, and they had an article written about it because it’s tough to reach LEED Platinum and it’s a data center (BIG PR value). Then do the math: $400,000 minus the $285,000 grant, minus the $92,000 in tax credits yields an out-of-pocket cost of $23,000. Then, take 30% off of that for the Federal Investment Tax Credit ($6,900), and you get to a cost of $16,100 after the taxes are filed for THIS year. That’s a 96% discount on a $400,000 system, and therefore a 3.1 year payback if you ONLY look at the small energy cost savings at one of the lowest electricity rates in the country. This system will generate 71 solar renewable energy credits (if eligible in Iowa), which are selling for roughly $300 each (and up to $600) on the open market. That’s a pre-tax INCOME of $21,300 for EACH YEAR of the 25-30 year lifetime that this system is cranking out electricity (assuming there is a market for SRECs for that period), plus the increased annual savings due to the escalating costs of electricity, that means they’re getting about 50% of their energy costs paid for in the early years due to the savings and SREC income. I’d say this was a damn smart purchase, with it being a money MAKER for them, and a payback of perhaps a year and a half (just waiting for the money). Plus, they’ve reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 75,386 lbs of CO2 EACH YEAR. That’s the equivalent of planting 5.83 acres of trees, or not driving a car 90,463 miles. It’s a shame the author missed the real payback on this. The incentives are necessary, and the benefits are long-lasting — reduced pollution, reduced greenhouse impact, reduced peak demand which lessens the need to build new power plants, energy production on-site which saves another 20-40% of electricity NOT generated and lost due to transmissions inefficiencies and line losses. It is a smart purchase that other companies should consider.
Brett Strouss | August 13th, 2009