August 17, 2009

Australian Government Negotiates on Climate Change Bill

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The Australian government has split its climate change bill into two parts so the renewable energy target will not be dependent on the carbon emissions scheme in an effort to break a deadlock in the Senate, which voted against the legislation last week, reports Taiwan News.

Opposition parties generally support the bill’s plan for 20 percent of electricity to come from renewable sources by 2020; however, lawmakers are divided on cutting and taxing carbon emissions, reports Taiwan News.

As a result, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said in the article that the renewable energy portion of the bill would now be voted on separately from the emissions trading scheme. The government hopes to pass the renewable sources legislation next week, according to the article.

Under the draft law for carbon reductions, Australia, the biggest coal exporter, wants to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 5 to 15 percent from 2000 levels in the next decade, reports Bloomberg News. Wong told the news agency that the government plans to reintroduce the carbon emissions legislation for a Senate vote before the end of the year.

Exxon Mobil Corp. told Bloomberg News a tax on carbon in Australia would be a better method to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The oil company and its partners are spending about A$3 billion ($2.5 billion) developing the Kipper-Tuna and Turrum fields in the Gippsland Basin off Victoria state, according to the news agency. Fossil fuels such as oil and gas are said to be one of the biggest contributors to the greenhouse effect.

A new study released by Danish professor Bjoern Lomborg supports Exxon Mobil’s theory. The study finds that a global carbon tax would be cheaper than emissions trading, reports Bloomberg News.

The study indicates that a $0.50 tax for each ton of emissions may generate $1.51 in avoided climate damage, compared with costs as high as $68 per ton, resulting in 2 cents of avoided damage, under some emissions-mitigations models, reports Bloomberg.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

miggs on European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
"Yet another example of the potential of combined heat & power to transform..."

Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."