September 1, 2009

Facing Declining Demand, Water Bottlers Start Price War

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Despite new strategies by bottled-water companies to offer more eco-friendly packaging, it hasn’t been enough to win back environmentally-minded customers. Bottled-water makers have stepped up a months-long price war to try to win back customers who now use tap water to reduce environmental waste and to save money, reports the Wall Street Journal. It could be an uphill battle as one UK study on the use of bottled water in the Parliament shows that a switch to tap water could save 11 tons of CO2 emissions per year.

PepsiCo, Coke and Nestle are some of the companies slashing prices. For example, PepsiCo Inc.’s Aquafina brand sold at some grocery stores for as little as $2.99 for a 24-pack of half-liter bottles, reports the Wall Street Journal.

In addition to lower pricing, bottled water companies have also been reducing the amount of plastic in their bottles in response to public criticism that bottled water is wasteful. As an example, Pepsi’s “Eco-Fina” half-liter bottle is made with 50 percent less plastic, and in May, Coca-Cola introduced the PlantBottle, a fully recyclable plastic bottle made partially from plant material, which is being piloted with the Dasani water brand.

Earlier this year, a new brand of Canadian spring water launched in a paper-based and recyclable carton, and Naya adopted a mixture of 50 percent recycled plastic for its water bottle.

For the year ended July 12, U.S. sales of bottled water fell 6 percent to $7.6 billion, according to market-research firm Information Resources Inc., whose figures don’t include sales from Wal-Mart Stores Inc., reports the Wall Street Journal.

However, it’s still unclear whether the price cutting can overcome bad press related to the environmental impact of plastic bottles. As an example, in the UK, a report commissioned by the Commons authorities into the Houses of Parliament’s use of bottled water found that it uses over 21,000 bottles of water each year, resulting in a carbon footprint of 12 tons, reports The Guardian.

The study, conducted by environmental consultants Best Foot Forward, finds that each year 10,000 bottles of sparkling and 11,400 bottles of still water are used in Parliament, while the associated delivery trucks tallied more than 70,000 miles over five years, according to The Guardian.

In addition, U.S. studies show that total energy required for bottled water production is as much as 2,000 times the energy cost of producing tap water, reports The Guardian.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

In addition to CO2 footprint, what about the quality of the water contained in the bottles – most of it is acidic and unhealthy for human consumption. The article also does not mention waste associated with filtration of bottled water. Where does that waste water go and what is in it?

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."