September 10, 2009
On-site Solar Poised for 22% Annual Growth
For retailers, supply chain operators and other small- to medium-sized businesses, decentralized electricity generation via rooftop and small-scale commercial solar photovoltaic panels represents one of the best ways to reduce conventional electricity generation and related infrastructure impacts, according to a new report from Pike Research.
Because on-site solar panels – or so-called distributed photovoltaics – are modular, systems of less than 20 megawatts in size are easy to add to both rooftops and solar gardens. The size of the distributed PV market is expected to grow from 3.6 GW in 2008 to 9.7 GW by 2013, or 22 percent compounded annual growth, according to the executive summary of the report, “Distributed Solar Energy Generation.” (PDF, registration required)
Still, compared to conventional electricity generation, distributed PVs represent just a drop in the bucket, as global electricity generation is expected to grow to 7 TW in 2030.
In fact, just four percent of global electricity generation in 2007 was considered renewable. And of those 160 GW, only four percent is distributed renewable.
The silver lining for distributed renewable energy is that it represents 16 percent of new capacity additions.
The report suggests that the market value of distributed PV sales will grow from $30 billion 2008 to nearly $60 billion by 2013.
This chart shows a comparison of the pros and cons of distributed solar and wind.

Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."





Reader Comments
Suggestion: When comparing PV and small wind using a $/W meteric can be misleading in residential / small comercial cases because of the energy generation per rated power (kWh/kW) – akin to capapcity factor. PV capacity factors are readily predictable and won’t vary much by scale. Wind capapcity factors however are harder to predict and generally the larger systems (100 kW) do better than smaller systems (10kW or less). We have seen wind systems in the 10 kW or less range with capapcity factors lower than the PV average. Also the installed $/W for a small systems (10 kW or less) are roughly in order with PV costs. The larger wind systems scale better and are generally more cost effective.
David Beavers | September 10th, 2009
I would point out that developing distributed renewable energy on a scale comparable to “planned” centralized, location constrained renewable development would decrease the need for associated transmission and ancillary infrastructure development. The weaknesses that are pointed out in your table apply to centralized RE sources as well. The obvious differences of centralized v distributed is how the benefits are “distributed.
Certainly comparing PV to Wind based on $/W of capacity is a very grey area,
for all the reasons pointed out by the previous commenter.Additionally regional forecasting difficulties are more likely to apply to wind.
I would suggest a review of your footprint data on PV. I own a 2KW STC rated array on 150 sq.ft. Perhaps you are using thin film figures?
Ron Dickerson
Ron Dickerson | September 10th, 2009