September 14, 2009
A Consumer First Approach to Sustainability
Walk into Florence’s Piazza della Signoria on a summer day and hundreds of birds instantly fly up and surround you. Take a cyber-walk today and the feeling is the same.
Almost everywhere you turn, the words “green” or “sustainability” seem to be in the air. Companies are “going green,” “investing in clean tech,” “increasing eco-efficiency” and hundreds of other things that make you wonder if you are doing enough both as an individual and as a business person to become “sustainable.”
Where does one draw the line between sufficient versus necessary with sustainability initiatives? How can executives determine and act on the most optimal course of action to becoming sustainable and green?
What we know
Consider the following facts related to sustainability and climate change.
Fact #1: World population is expected to increase to 9 billion by 2050.
World population will be heavily skewed towards a global middle class with high consumption patterns. There will continue to be heavy societal pressure in both developed and developing countries to maintain these consumption patterns. Consumption is increasing and will continue to increase.
Fact #2: Consumers are highly aware of sustainability but haven’t translated that awareness into buying patterns due to various factors.
A recent survey found that consumers in most countries are becoming aware of environmental concerns. The percentage rose from 57 percent in 2007 to 80 percent in 2008. Most of this awareness and willingness to act has so far taken shape within their homes and as relates to saving money. It has not translated overwhelmingly into buying patterns.

Fact #3: There is no common definition of sustainability.

There is any amount of literature that defines sustainability. While everyone talks about a “holistic” approach inclusive of environment, social and profit obligations, in reality, the definition varies widely across companies and consumers. In the chart above, a recent survey reveals the very divergent attitudes consumers have towards sustainability. There are no common definitions for a sustainable lifestyle or consumption.
A Way Forward
Taken all together, these facts and trends underline not only the importance of sustainability action but also the urgency of sustainability action. And given the magnitude of negative trends, sustainability action needs to be the best informed - i.e. rely on the most accurate data available and most likely to produce the best results for long term growth and value.
What makes the most sense is to start with the consumer and use the core strengths of the organization to service that consumer.
Here are three critical actions that a company can take in its journey towards consumer-led sustainability.
1. Focus on your most important consumer segments.
The first order of business for any company is to consider the movement between the two critical segments – green and mainstream. Is the green consumer base widening to include more and more mainstream consumers? Will there be enough green consumers to justify product innovation investments in the future? Any business that wants to be consumer driven should focus on understanding this green consumer base and the growth in green consumers.
2. Focus on defining sustainability within products for these segments.
Consumers everywhere look at performance at a justifiable price. Performance differs widely within green consumer segments and marketers need to identify those sustainability attributes that green consumers are willing to pay for. Companies need to refine understanding and possibilities of sustainability within each of these segments.
3. Focus on matching green production and procurement processes to consumption cycles.
Green production should be matched to consumers’ consumption cycles. By consumption cycles, we refer to the processes that happen when consumers buy, use and ultimately, discard or re-use the product. For instance, not all consumers want or need a “recyclable” pen but they may overwhelmingly buy a pen that has been produced in an “earth-friendly” manner and that is appealing because of its low carbon. Matching production to seasonality of sustainable buying patterns is another critical element of this step.
What is unique about the three steps outlined above is not the sequence of the steps themselves but the rigor with which they should be applied to sustainability. Harnessing the opportunity present in the sustainability space is not a one-time planning exercise or a soft skills based exercise. There needs to be significant analytical rigor in understanding the meaning of sustainability to consumers and innovating to produce products and services to meet that latent demand.
As with all initiatives, a well thought out approach towards sustainability is critical. Companies that are able to move up the maturity curve to take advantage of sustainable business opportunities will be very pleasantly surprised by the results – in any economic climate.
Kady Srinivasan is the practice lead for sustainability at Clarkston Consulting.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."





Reader Comments
Thank you for this well thougth out approach. Our Company GreenSmart has been on exactly this path for some time now. Just on Friday I wrote the first of a series of blogs I am writing on Be Green, Buy Green, which will specifically discuss how our Company accomplishes the above tasks.
Consumers and consumerism has never felt the need to address the issues of eco or social responsibility. Those times are changing. It will take considerable, ongoing education to bring consumers and retail buyers along on what the meanings and repercussions of even the smallest of consumer decisions from all that is possible for them to consider. There is no need for the concept of “thoughtless” consumerism to continue. Articles like this and the hundreds and thousands of others like it necessary over the next 25 years will move the process. Thank you.
Tom Larsen | September 14th, 2009