September 15, 2009

Troubles Ahead for California’s Climate and Solar Bills

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

California’s Governor says he plans to veto a bill that requires the state to get one third of its electricity from renewable resources, while state legislators failed to pass a solar bill that would expand the state’s net metering program.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger believes the bill would make it more difficult to build solar plants in the state and to buy power from neighbors, although he will issue an executive order with the same goal, but different rules, according to Reuters.

Schwarzenegger will put the burden on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to implement the 33 percent goal, but that agency, which is already implementing AB32 greenhouse gas regulations, will be given no additional resources, according to the California Majority Report.

Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers association, which backs the governor’s veto, told Reuters that makers of solar thermal power plants would face new permitting requirements, and out-of-state wind generators would face limits on generation outside California.

At the same time, the 2009 California Legislative failed to pass AB 560, a bill that would have allowed solar customers to continue benefiting from a program called net energy metering. This program enables energy customers to reduce their power bills when their small solar or wind system output exceeds their use.

Proponents of the bill say by not passing the bill, which would have doubled the net metering program capacity to 5 percent, will dramatically reduce solar installations and impact green jobs.

Without AB 560, parts of California are expected to receive enough applications to hit the current program cap as early as 2010 according to estimates from solar advocacy groups.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

It’s too bad about the net metering bill. That really seems like a no brainer. The 30% mandate seems excessive and given the state’s mounting financial concerns, maybe things like that should wait until the economy has a brighter future. In that time we should see a reduction in solar costs and hopefully 30% of the energy will come from renewable naturally.

Too bad California is broke. This would really help the solar industry in California. And how are we planning to get 33% renewables while we have no money to throw into it? Adding an extra mandate while providing no extra funding makes little sense.

bit of a shame really. but no one can fault arnies efforts in renewables, the one million rooftop scheme was like a breath of fresh air

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."