September 28, 2009

At 10.2M Metric Tons, Apple Reports Emissions For First Time

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Product use accounts for 53 percent of the 10.2 million metric tons of emissions associated with the lifecycle analysis of Apple products, according to the company’s latest environmental report.

Manufacturing accounts for 38 percent of the emissions, followed by transportation (5 percent), facilities (3 percent) and recycling (1 percent). Previously, the company had been criticized for not revealing its emissions. In a “Guide to Greener Electronics” issued in July by Greenpeace, Apple rated in the lower-middle of the pack.

In the new report, Apple puts much stock into reducing the amount of materials used in its products, as well as reducing the amount of toxic materials used (see graphics to the left).

Additionally, Apple has been auditing members of its supply chain. In 2008, Apple audited 83 facilities, up from 39 in 2007. About 97 percent of the core issues assessed by auditors were in compliance, according to the 2009 Supplier Responsibility Progress Report (PDF).

The company also is reducing the amount of packaging used, which enables more unites to be sent in each shipping container. For example, between 2006 and 2009 the packaging for 13-inch MacBooks has been cut 40 percent, meaning the company can fit 50 percent more boxes per airline shipping container.

Below is a look at the company’s recycling record, as a percentage of the weight of products sold seven years earlier.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Unfortunately the report doesn’t, for obvious PR reasons, acknowledge the role of coal-fired power stations in Shenzhen, China, where sub-contractor Hon Hai makes most of Apple’s products. China is building 550 coal-fired power stations to utilise its ten trillion tonnes of coal reserves, a process encouraged by every iPhone sold in the West. The real emissions totals for Apple, and for other companies outsourcing in China, are far higher than those indicated. Some people would also like to see an account of where the Lithium used in all portable Apple products’ batteries comes from- it’s almost certainly Tibet, which would open up a whole new set of issues for a future report.

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."