<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA to Require Large Emitters to use &#8216;Best Technologies&#8217; to Reduce Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/epa-to-require-large-emitters-to-use-best-technologies-to-reduce-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/epa-to-require-large-emitters-to-use-best-technologies-to-reduce-emissions/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hultgren</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/epa-to-require-large-emitters-to-use-best-technologies-to-reduce-emissions/comment-page-1/#comment-151715</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hultgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=21849#comment-151715</guid>
		<description>It is not clear to me how this CAA regulation by EPA would &quot;galvinize industrial opposition to cap and trade&quot; as the above article states. 

I think it would rather have the opposite effect: when faced with the choice of EPA regulation vs. legislation regarding GHG reductions, industry will favor a legislative approach (i.e. cap and trade) since legislation can be more carefully crafted to send a more controlled price signal and ensure a smoother transition to a carbon-constrained economy.

Andy
SWCA Environmental Performance Group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not clear to me how this CAA regulation by EPA would &#8220;galvinize industrial opposition to cap and trade&#8221; as the above article states. </p>
<p>I think it would rather have the opposite effect: when faced with the choice of EPA regulation vs. legislation regarding GHG reductions, industry will favor a legislative approach (i.e. cap and trade) since legislation can be more carefully crafted to send a more controlled price signal and ensure a smoother transition to a carbon-constrained economy.</p>
<p>Andy<br />
SWCA Environmental Performance Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

