Apple Drops Bombshell, Immediately Withdraws from U.S. Chamber

October 5, 2009

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Becoming the first major consumer brand to make a big statement against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s position on climate change, Apple has decided to leave the organization.

In contrast to PG&E, PMN and Exelon, the utilities that in recent weeks announced their intention not to renew their chamber memberships, Apple is making its exit from the chamber effective immediately, reports the Washington Post.

In a letter to the chamber, Apple Vice President Catherine Novelli wrote, “Apple supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions, and it is frustrating to find the Chamber at odds with us in this effort,” the Post reported.

Apple’s move comes as companies increasingly are leaning on the chamber to quit fighting the general concept of climate change, as well as efforts to make emissions a more central part of the political dialogue.

Additionally, the companies are responding to the chamber’s call to put the science behind climate change on trial.

Last week, Nike signaled its displeasure with the chamber by giving up its seat on the chamber’s board of directors. At the time, Nike said it wanted the chamber to play a positive role in the climate change discussion.

“It is important that US companies be represented by a strong and effective Chamber that reflects the interests of all its members on multiple issues. We believe that on the issue of climate change the Chamber has not represented the diversity of perspective held by the board of directors,” Nike said.

In response to the fallout from companies leaving the business lobby, the Chamber of Commerce issued a statement, aimed at defending and clarifying its position.

Thomas Donahue, President and CEO of the chamber, said the chamber wants the U.S. and other nations to negotiate an international agreement that sets binding CO2 reduction commitments for each nation, “while allowing each to devise its own best path to meeting its target.”

Apple’s move comes as it seeks to clarify its efforts to cut emissions.

Responding to criticism over its past failure to disclose its emissions, the tech company last week revealed its total 10.2 million metric tons of emissions in its most recent sustainability report.

In April of 2007, Apple ranked dead last on Greenpeace’s ranking of green electronics manufacturers. Among other things, Greenpeace cited Apple’s refusal to disclose its overall emissions.

In this summer’s Greenpeace ranking, Apple was in the lower-middle of the pack.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Pew Center Conference: Corporate Energy Efficiency

Reduce energy consumption, lower emissions and save money. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

I am happy that a big name player like Apple is showing the US Chamber their views on climate change are not in line with most of their members’ thoughts on the subject; however, I believe Apple’s bold move was born from its marketing department just as much as its sustainability interests.

Matt Courtland of A Sustainable Life | October 6th, 2009

Good for Apple! Why are others hesitating? Don’t they think the chamber would accept their dues in the future, after it changes its message? Now, how about the Nat’l Assn of Manufacturers, the other partner in ridiculous, who in the 1980s rejected the quality movement and triggered the loss of the US manufacturing sector, a loss from which the US has still has not recovered?

John Atkins | October 6th, 2009

damn the science…political correctness is all that matters…they don’t care if they’re respected…they want to be “liked”…so appropriate for the Nike’s and Apple’s of the world…good riddance…may we now have an adult debate please…based upon facts, not emotionally charged rhetoric…

mark | October 6th, 2009

very perceptive Matt…for if Apple’s narcisstic move were truly born of their “green” heart, they would have been openly sharing emissions data for a long time and been leading the charge for others to do so…they sense a marketing opportunity, as does Nike.

fyi John, the loss of the US manufacturing sector was overwhelmingly driven by the lower cost of labor in other countries, and even they have lost to each other in a steady succession of new “low” cost labor markets…you can bash unions for that if you want, but it really doesn’t matter, it would have happened regardless – and is continuing to happen to the former “winners”…just ask Mexico…who lost to India/China…who have started losing to former eastern block nations…and will eventually whine about all of the developing South American economies with lower cost labor than their own.

No “association” forced GM to make bad cars. They did that all on their own…yet I still own two of them…go figure…

mark | October 6th, 2009

Good for them! I mean, the other companies have shown their displeasure and have vowed not to renew, but this is huge! Go Apple!

Taylen | October 6th, 2009

Apple is trying it seems…they are releasing their numbers, they are leaving an organization that spoke their former language…”Crisis, what crisis”. It seems that the Chamber is one of the few remaining ivory tower icons.
Instead of critisizing and looking for motive, we should try to accept the effort and expect the motive. Big business, corporate world needs to work very hard to regain any trust but I believe we should cautiously applaud their efforts.

Iain | October 6th, 2009

After all the old white men running the USA CoC retire to the great chamber in the sky, maybe we will start seeing reasonable responses to the significant issues facing this country. Their opposition to long standing policies like a minimum wage demonstrate their committment to maximizing profits at the expense of our health and welfare.

Bob Ellington | October 7th, 2009

“Apple ranked dead last on Greenpeace’s ranking of green electronics manufacturers.” This is old information. Check: How the companies line up: 12th edition
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-12

Jelle | October 8th, 2009

New Environmental Leader Reports

Green Marketing: What Works; What Doesn't - A Market Study of Practitioners

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

02/09/2010
02/08/2010
02/05/2010

Charts [ see all ]

Caterpillar Puts Weight Behind $1.5B FutureGen CCS Project

Federal Government Proposes Climate Change Office

34% of Execs Cite Economy As Impediment to Adopting Sustainability

CEO Report Envisions $6 Trillion in Sustainable New Business Opportunities

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."

Environmental Leader