Emissions Traders Oppose Senate’s Limits on Carbon Credit Imports
Restricting cheap carbon credits that can be imported from poor countries in a proposed U.S. cap-and-trade system will drive up costs for consumers, according to the Geneva-based International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), reports Bloomberg News.
The Senate Democrats proposal cuts the offset limits in half to 500 million tons per year from tropical rain forests and clean energy projects in developing countries compared to a plan passed by the U.S. House in June.
In a statement (PDF) about the U.S. Senate’s Kerry-Boxer draft legislation on energy and emissions trading, the IETA said depriving the U.S. carbon market of international offsets has no benefit, and would lead to higher costs and a less efficient, more volatile marketplace.
U.S. power plants, oil refineries and factories could use the offsets, each representing one metric ton of carbon dioxide, instead of the pollution allowances created by the cap-and-trade program to comply with new greenhouse-gas reduction targets, reports Bloomberg News.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s analysis of the House proposal said the price of carbon dioxide allowances in a U.S. cap-and-trade program would nearly double if cheaper offsets couldn’t be imported, reports Bloomberg.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Embracing New Tech Is Key to Greater Energy Savings, Say Experts
- SolarCity: We Have the World’s Most Efficient Rooftop Solar Panel
- Bridgestone Arena in Nashville Switches to LEDs
- Helping Building Automation Grow
- Municipalities Could Combine Small Cell and LED Upgrades
- Holistic Approach to Energy Savings in Dublin, Ohio Schools
- NYC One Step Closer to Net-Zero Energy Goal at Wastewater Treatment Plants
- ‘Better Buildings, Better Plants’ Saves $2.4B Over Five Years