October 14, 2009

Investors Pressure GM, Boeing, Deere, Xerox to Quit U.S. Chamber

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Trying to ramp up pressure on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its position on climate change, an investors group has fired off letters to 14 major U.S. corporations, asking them to publicly distance themselves from the chamber’s positions.

Representing $16 billion in assets, the investors group is led by Walden Asset Management and Green Century Capital Management. The group also is asking the companies to clarify their positions to the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), which has opposed government action on climate change.

The investors group chose the 14 companies based on previous statements from the firms that they support action on climate change, according to a press release.

The investors group, in the letters, asked the companies to address their disagreement with the chamber and NAM by any of three methods:

  • withdraw membership
  • publicly disclose their disagreement with the chamber and NAM’s positions
  • ask the chamber and NAM to refund the portion of dues used to lobby against climate change action.

The letters state that the company’s face serious business and reputational risks due to the “misalignment of positions.”

“While some companies, including (yours), have articulated a business rationale for a national policy that reduces greenhouse gas emissions, … membership in NAM/Chamber sends a starkly contradictory message,” the letters state.

The 14 companies targeted by the investors group are:

  • Air Products & Chemicals
  • Alcoa
  • American Electric Power
  • Boeing Co.
  • Caterpillar
  • Cummins
  • Deere & Co.
  • DTE Energy
  • Entergy
  • Ford Motor Co.
  • General Motors Corp.
  • Lockheed Martin
  • Whirlpool
  • Xerox Corp.

A total of 43 investment groups and investment-focused organizations signed the letters. Those groups include: As You Sow, Catholic Healthcare West, Mercy Investment Program, Portfolio 21 and Trillium Asset Management Corp., among others.

To date, Apple has been the highest profile defection from the chamber. Also in recent weeks, PG&E, PMN and Exelon, three utilities, announced their intention not to renew their chamber memberships.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Climate change issues include reducing plastic and energy use. Manufacturers use….Plastic….and energy…. For example, the plastic bag industry, like the plastic water bottle industry, will do anything possible to save themselves…like continue a membership with the Chamber!
Change is hard for everyone…

I can’t wait to see the effect of the letters. If these companies leave the Chamber, it will almost guarantee passage of climate change legislation. http://bit.ly/1aXmJD How funny is it that the Chamber’s own actions will cause the new legislation that it is fighting so hard to stop?

More enviro-fascist insanity.

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."