October 15, 2009
Voluntary Carbon Market Found Lacking
Industry players in the voluntary carbon market are unhappy with the lack of meaningful emission cuts, yet voluntary emissions cuts continue to gain steam. For instance, BP is spending $2.5 million to offset its carbon emissions in Australia.
Meanwhile, Brazil may set emission caps at 2005 levels.
The voluntary carbon offset market is not meeting meaningful emission cuts yet, with only 34.69 million tons of retired carbon offset credits, according to attendees at a recent carbon industry conference, reports Reuters.
Carbon credits totaling 123 million tons, valued at $705 million, were transacted in the global voluntary carbon market in 2008, according to New Energy Finance and Ecosystem Marketplace estimates, reports Reuters. More than 50 percent of those offset credits were originally designed for the United Nation’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), but were delayed by bottlenecks in the pipeline process.
Voluntary offset credits can change hands several times before they are retired, but credits do not offset greenhouse gas emissions until they are retired, or taken permanently off the market, by a supplier or purchaser.
The voluntary market operates outside mandatory emissions reductions schemes such as the Kyoto Protocol or the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme. It evolved primarily in the United States as a market-based mechanism to address climate change and in Europe as a byproduct of implementing the Kyoto pact, reports Reuters.
Carbon offset companies like Australia’s Carbon Conscious offer businesses a way to offset their carbon emissions through “carbon farming.” As an example, BP plans to offset its carbon emissions by paying $2.5 million (along with ongoing license fees) toCarbon Conscious to plant up to 10 million salt-resistant mallee eucalypt trees in saline-affected farmland in Australia’s wheat belt region, reports PerthNow.
The tree planting project will also generate tradable carbon credits under the Australian Government’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS), according to PerthNow.
The forestation program will begin next year, with both companies sharing in the value of the resulting carbon offsets over a 15-year period, according to PerthNow. BP also has the option to invest additional funds for plantings in 2011 and 2012, once regulatory certainty surrounding the CPRS has been established, reports the news site. In August, Australia voted down its carbon trading scheme.
Under the carbon sink scheme, carbon-producing companies have access to carbon credits at a predetermined price, which protects them from future carbon price increases or supply shortages, reports PerthNow.
Earlier this year, BP’s top executive called for global carbon pricing.
Developing countries including Brazil, China, and India have been reluctant to commit to carbon emissions reductions, despite the urging of industrialized countries to set firm, but smaller, commitments ahead of the global climate change summit in December.
Brazil may consider changing its position on carbon caps. Brazil’s Environment Minister Carlos Minc recently said the country may set a cap on its greenhouse gas emissions at 2005 levels as it finalizes its proposals ahead of the global climate summit, which could cost the country at least $10 billion annually, reports Reuters.
Brazil emitted roughly 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide in 2005, primarily from Amazon forest destruction. If it adopted no mitigation measures, its emissions would increase to 2.8 billion tons annually by 2020, according to Minc, reports Reuters.
Brazil also announced it would expand its deforestation targets in the Amazon forest, aiming for an 80 percent reduction in the deforestation rate by 2020, based on the annual average of 19,500 sq km (7,528 sq miles) between 1996 and 2005, reports Reuters.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."





Reader Comments
Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) is expensive, time consuming (decades) and ecologically unsound. Cap and Trade is equally so. Carbon Capture Recycling/Reduction (E.R.C., etc.) is cheaper, better, faster and available now from companies like Mantra Venture Group. Why is their promotion of this better way, guys?
Steven Schultz | October 15th, 2009
carbon offset and trading are useless, we need to clean energy, use less energy and defend the forests.
Derek Wall | October 15th, 2009
Reuse, recycle, renew, but carbon offsets are a scam.
.
Kenny | October 17th, 2009