November 2, 2009
Global Climate Talks Set Carbon Offsets in Motion, Market May Quadruple by 2015
The success of the emerging global carbon market rests on the outcome of the Copenhagen Climate Conference in December, according to a report from market researcher Frost & Sullivan. In the meantime, European Union leaders have agreed on a climate deal to present at the global climate talks. But analysts say the biggest polluters, such as energy and utility companies, will be the biggest winners in a climate deal as they capture low carbon subsidies thanks to their financial clout.
As an example, the European Union (EU) wants to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 20 percent over 1990 levels by 2020, and by up to 30 percent if an agreement is reached in Copenhagen, cites Frost & Sullivan.
Research from Frost & Sullivan’s Asset Management — European Emissions Trading Market shows that the emissions reduction market earned revenues of $94.28 billion in 2008 with projections to reach $344.64 billion in 2015.
The research indicates that international agreements on climate change after 2010 will drive the global carbon market to the next stage of development. In addition, the U.S. emissions trading market is expected to be three times larger than the EU market, which will push greater participation by financial institutions, said the analyst.
The research finds that growth in the emissions trading market is largely contingent upon global regulatory support for carbon emissions reduction initiatives and on the expected increase in energy prices. Even under current economic conditions, the European emissions trading market will grow, although at a slower rate, because trade volumes are looking up even though European Union allowance (EUA) carbon prices have shrunk.
Despite market opportunities, participants are concerned about the use of project credits like certified emissions reduction (CER) and emissions reduction units (ERUs) after 2012, which are often subject to procedural delays under the clean development mechanism (CDM) and joint implementation (JI), according to the report. The report also finds the role of these credits after 2012 is uncertain and hinges on whether a deal is reached in Copenhagen.
Industrialized countries including Australia, Norway, New Zealand, and Japan have launched or are expected to launch cap-and-trade systems, which once linked will likely result in better carbon prices, according to the report.
European Union leaders including those in Britain and Denmark have agreed on a climate deal ahead of the global climate talks in Copenhagen, but east European officials said they still have to determine how to divide the bill for helping countries deal with climate change, reports Reuters.
Nine east European countries say some wealthier regions in developing countries are better off than parts of poorer European states such as Romania, and excessive handouts could stall the region’s economic recovery, according to Reuters.
Developing countries have maintained over the past several months that they will not address climate change without funds and technology from rich nations.
Analysts believe that big energy, utilities and engineering companies, among some of the biggest polluters, are using their financial clout and market awareness to capture low carbon subsidies and to own the most viable low-carbon technologies, reports Reuters.
They also get government incentives as big emitters, reports the news agency.
Researchers and scientists aren’t happy that oil firms, utilities and big engineering companies may hold the keys to a low-carbon future, and they worry that insufficient public funds are reaching start-up companies and entrepreneurs, report Reuters.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."





Reader Comments
There are many reasons why Cap and Trade is wrong,
whether or not you believe that emissions should be lowered
http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x
Emission Trading (Cap and Trade)
Basic Idea — Offsets — Tree Planting —
International Trade: Manufacture Shift — Fair Trade — Surreal Market — Allowances: Auctions + Hand-Outs — Allowance Trading —
Companies: Business Stability + Cost — In Conclusion
As it happens,
if there is to be an emission policy,
Electricity and Transport sectors alone (80% of emissions) are sufficient to meet emission reduction targets,
with measures advantageous in themselves (including energy renewability, and that emissions contain much else, whatever about CO2),
long term funded for reduced consumer price impact,
without efficiency regulation, industrial carbon taxes or cap and trade schemes
http://www.ceolas.net/#cc1x
.
peter dublin | November 2nd, 2009