<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Climate Talks Set Carbon Offsets in Motion, Market May Quadruple by 2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/02/global-climate-talks-set-carbon-offsets-in-motion-market-may-quadruple-by-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/02/global-climate-talks-set-carbon-offsets-in-motion-market-may-quadruple-by-2015/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter dublin</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/02/global-climate-talks-set-carbon-offsets-in-motion-market-may-quadruple-by-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-159577</link>
		<dc:creator>peter dublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=26495#comment-159577</guid>
		<description>There are many reasons why Cap and Trade is wrong,
whether or not you believe that emissions should be lowered
http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x
Emission Trading  (Cap and Trade)
Basic Idea -- Offsets -- Tree Planting -- 
International Trade: Manufacture Shift -- Fair Trade -- Surreal Market -- Allowances: Auctions + Hand-Outs -- Allowance Trading -- 
Companies: Business Stability + Cost -- In Conclusion

As it happens,
if there is to be an emission policy,
Electricity and Transport sectors alone (80% of emissions) are sufficient to meet emission reduction targets,
with measures advantageous in themselves (including energy renewability, and that emissions contain much else, whatever about CO2), 
long term funded for reduced consumer price impact,
without efficiency regulation, industrial carbon taxes or cap and trade schemes
http://www.ceolas.net/#cc1x
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many reasons why Cap and Trade is wrong,<br />
whether or not you believe that emissions should be lowered<br />
<a href="http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x" rel="nofollow">http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x</a><br />
Emission Trading  (Cap and Trade)<br />
Basic Idea &#8212; Offsets &#8212; Tree Planting &#8212;<br />
International Trade: Manufacture Shift &#8212; Fair Trade &#8212; Surreal Market &#8212; Allowances: Auctions + Hand-Outs &#8212; Allowance Trading &#8212;<br />
Companies: Business Stability + Cost &#8212; In Conclusion</p>
<p>As it happens,<br />
if there is to be an emission policy,<br />
Electricity and Transport sectors alone (80% of emissions) are sufficient to meet emission reduction targets,<br />
with measures advantageous in themselves (including energy renewability, and that emissions contain much else, whatever about CO2),<br />
long term funded for reduced consumer price impact,<br />
without efficiency regulation, industrial carbon taxes or cap and trade schemes<br />
<a href="http://www.ceolas.net/#cc1x" rel="nofollow">http://www.ceolas.net/#cc1x</a><br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

