Climate Change Will Harm U.S. Economy, Economists Say

November 9, 2009

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Almost all 144 top economists surveyed for a New York University School of Law report agree that climate change threatens the United States economy and that carbon regulation — whether it’s a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system — will drive energy efficiency and innovation, reports the New York Times’ Green Inc. blog.

The report, Economists and Climate Change (PDF), finds that 84 percent of the economists agreed that environmental effects of greenhouse gas emissions “presents a clear danger” to the United States and the global economy, despite uncertainties regarding the exact speed and severity of global warming. The study also finds that the majority of economists (86 percent) believe the agriculture sector will be hit the hardest, followed by fishing (71.3 percent) and forestry (66.9 percent).

Yet, Senators continue to debate whether climate change threatens the U.S. economy and U.S. agriculture, even while over 80 percent of expert economists believe that global warming will have negative impacts on each, according to researchers.

The economists also agreed with a market-based approach to limiting carbon emissions, with 80.6 percent supporting the auctioning of emissions allowances, while 9 percent believed the government should give them away, reports Green Inc.

Despite the over 80 percent of experts who believe auctioning is the economically better choice, Congress has moved towards giving away most emissions allowances for free, according to the report.

The article cites two key findings: nearly all the economists — 94.3 percent — said the United States should agree to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through an international climate treaty, while fifty-seven percent said the country should make a commitment even without an agreement.

And 73 percent of the respondents agreed that the uncertainty on the severity of climate change raises the economic value of implementing measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which would increase energy efficiency and promote innovation, according to 97 percent of the respondents.

There was less consensus on how to calculate the economic damage from each ton of carbon emitted, with economists’ estimates ranging from $20 to $100 a ton, according to the article.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

My Plea :

In the face of drastic dent in fossil fuels and soaring price of them, the hands-off policy reflects economic crash world-wide.

It doesn’t matter whether someone is on the upper deck of Titanic ship or not as the global economy is interconnected just like Internet.

hsr0601 | November 9th, 2009

We need to adapt. Take a look at this article The Great Transition: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21656220/The-Great-Transition-Navigating-Social-Economic-Ecological-Change-in-Turbulent-Times

fling | November 9th, 2009

It would have been interesting to see a differentiation between economists who support a carbon tax vs. those who support a cap and trade system. The overwhelming majority of leading scientists and economists prefer the carbon tax, but it would have been nice to see the numbers…

CTF | November 9th, 2009

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."

Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."

George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."

Environmental Leader