<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/no-sunny-skies-for-two-solar-projects-in-texas-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/no-sunny-skies-for-two-solar-projects-in-texas-california/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keely Wachs</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/no-sunny-skies-for-two-solar-projects-in-texas-california/comment-page-1/#comment-163333</link>
		<dc:creator>Keely Wachs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27601#comment-163333</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your continued coverage of these important issues.  As Sr. Director of Communications for BrightSource Energy, I would like to make it clear that this project is moving forward and is in no way facing a &quot;no-go&quot; as written in the story.  In fact, the California Energy Commission and the Bureau of Land Management issued a draft environmental impact statement two weeks ago, which marks a key milestone in the permitting of this facility.  

In addition, the BLM recently named the Ivanpah project as one of six fast-tracked as a priority.

With any development, there are some environmental concerns associated with the project.  We are working with these agencies and the environmental community to address these issues.  

In terms of our environmental efforts, Ivanpah will avoid more than 13 million tons of CO2 emissions over its 30-year lifecycle, as well as 85 percent of the air emissions from an equally-sized natural gas plant.  The plants will employ dry-cooling, which will reduce water usage by 90 percent, allowing Ivanpah to use approximately 30 times less water than competing technologies using wet cooling.  The project will use roughly 100 acre feet of water – the equivalent of 300 homes’ annual water usage, and far less than the amount used by the adjacent golf course or nearby casinos.  While dry-cooling comes at an additional cost, we believe that this proven technology must be used to help conserve precious desert water.  

Ivanpah’s environmental considerations to reduce development impacts also include a low-impact design and use of a currently-used high-voltage transmission pathway that transects the site.  The low impact design utilizes BrightSource’s proprietary hanging heliostats, which minimize the need for grading and concrete pads required for competing technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your continued coverage of these important issues.  As Sr. Director of Communications for BrightSource Energy, I would like to make it clear that this project is moving forward and is in no way facing a &#8220;no-go&#8221; as written in the story.  In fact, the California Energy Commission and the Bureau of Land Management issued a draft environmental impact statement two weeks ago, which marks a key milestone in the permitting of this facility.  </p>
<p>In addition, the BLM recently named the Ivanpah project as one of six fast-tracked as a priority.</p>
<p>With any development, there are some environmental concerns associated with the project.  We are working with these agencies and the environmental community to address these issues.  </p>
<p>In terms of our environmental efforts, Ivanpah will avoid more than 13 million tons of CO2 emissions over its 30-year lifecycle, as well as 85 percent of the air emissions from an equally-sized natural gas plant.  The plants will employ dry-cooling, which will reduce water usage by 90 percent, allowing Ivanpah to use approximately 30 times less water than competing technologies using wet cooling.  The project will use roughly 100 acre feet of water – the equivalent of 300 homes’ annual water usage, and far less than the amount used by the adjacent golf course or nearby casinos.  While dry-cooling comes at an additional cost, we believe that this proven technology must be used to help conserve precious desert water.  </p>
<p>Ivanpah’s environmental considerations to reduce development impacts also include a low-impact design and use of a currently-used high-voltage transmission pathway that transects the site.  The low impact design utilizes BrightSource’s proprietary hanging heliostats, which minimize the need for grading and concrete pads required for competing technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/no-sunny-skies-for-two-solar-projects-in-texas-california/comment-page-1/#comment-163199</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27601#comment-163199</guid>
		<description>the city of Houston would be wise to sign the 25 year contract ... if not for 25 years ... then at least 10 years ... a Great Opportunity for the city of Houston to invest in the Sun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the city of Houston would be wise to sign the 25 year contract &#8230; if not for 25 years &#8230; then at least 10 years &#8230; a Great Opportunity for the city of Houston to invest in the Sun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

