November 27, 2009
2010 Solar Pricing To Be About Half the 2008 Cost
By the end of the year, the levelized cost of adding solar should be about half what it was in 2008, according to new analysis by New Energy Finance.
The 50 percent drop in levelized solar costs compares to about a 10 percent drop in levelized costs for other forms of renewable energy. The levelized cost refers to the lifetime cost per kilowatt hour before subsidies.
So far this year, the higher cost of financing has canceled out some of the savings from lower product costs, New Energy Finance says. But the group expects capital markets to free up significantly by year’s end, prompting its heady prediction of a 50 percent drop in the cost of adding solar.
Thin-film solar can cost as little as $3 per watt of installed capacity, making it the least expensive option – about 25 percent less than crystalline silicone systems. Prices for photovoltaic projects with tracking systems have not declined as much, however.
As for wind, turbine prices are about 18-20 percent lower than in early 2008. But as wind projects are moved offshore, the lower costs will be offset by the engineering and technical costs of adding turbines in a coastal environment, New Energy Finance says.
Finally, the cost of drilling for geothermal energy dropped by nearly 50 percent at certain times in the past year as a lack of financing and cheaper oil dried up the market, leading to a glut of drilling services. However, that market is starting to recover, with levelized costs up 8-10 percent in the last quarter alone.
According to a recent report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, California has nearly 530,000 kilowatts of direct current solar (kWdc) connected to the grid, followed by New Jersey (70,000 kWdc), Colorado (35,ooo kWdc), Nevada (34,000 kWdc) and Arizona (25,000 kWdc).
Texas leads all states in wind power capacity at 7,117 MW, followed by Iowa (2,791 MW), California (2,503 MW), Minnesota (1,753 MW) and Washington (1,446 MW).
Advertisers
Pew Center Conference: Corporate Energy Efficiency
Reduce energy consumption, lower emissions and save money. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 02/09/2010
- 02/08/2010
- 02/05/2010
- Caterpillar Puts Weight Behind $1.5B FutureGen CCS Project
- WR Grace Targets 20% Energy Intensity Cuts
- As UK Cap and Trade Falters, Government May Prop Up Carbon Prices
- Federal Government Proposes Climate Change Office
- University of Florida Football Complex Uses 25% Less Energy Than Similar Buildings
- 34% of Execs Cite Economy As Impediment to Adopting Sustainability
- Energy Storage Project Aims to Extend Utility of Solar Power
- Ford to Debut Electric Commercial Van
- SF OKs $150M in Property Tax Financing for Energy Efficiency, Renewables
- BNSF Signs Deal for Measuring Energy Efficiency
- Roundup: GE, IBM, Audi ‘Green Police,’ EU Carbon
- Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
- Holiday Inn Express, Bardessono Boast Energy Efficiency, Renewables
- Massachusetts Adds $20M in Solar to 12 Wastewater Plants
- Novo Nordisk Cuts CO2 Emissions by 32%, Water Use by 20%
- Roundup: Dr. Suess Cease-and-Desist, Philips, EPA, Melting Drywall
- Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
- Energy-Efficient Lighting Saves Canadian Tire $6M in 2009
- Pixar Data Center Saves Money Via Cold Aisle Containment
- HVAC Software Helps University of Texas Save $500K a Year
- Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
- Rytec’s Fast Cold Storage Door Helps Save Energy
- Burt’s Bees Decreases Waste to Landfill by 51.5% in 2009
- National RES Would Benefit Southeastern, Manufacturing States
- TBR Evaluates Sustainability Strategies at Dell, CSC, Cisco
- CEO Report Envisions $6 Trillion in Sustainable New Business Opportunities
- IBM ‘Cloud Computing’ Data Center Saves 15% in Energy Costs
- Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
- Collapsible Ocean Shipping Container May Help Reduce Emissions
- To Ensure Future Compliance, Utility Asks for CO2 Limits
- Analyzing Energy-Efficiency Metrics Can Reduce Energy Use in Data Centers
- Goose Island Touts Low-Carbon Brew
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."
Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."
Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."
Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."
Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."
Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"
Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."





Reader Comments
Why is it that when thin film cost is noted as being least expensive, it’s never followed by its effciency is 50% of silicon based PV? Hum, wonder why its cheap. Also, why isn’t it isn’t noted that thin film is made with CaTl which in a land fill is extremely hard on the environment? Somehow these facts just seem to get in the way of the story of thin film.
Charlie | November 27th, 2009
@Charlie – That thin-film cost is in units of $ per Watt, not $ per square meter. So efficiency differences are accounted for.
As for the landfill thing, don’t know. Maybe they will need special recycling processes (take back or something). Not exactly an impossible hurdle. We have special waste collection for household paint, which is much more ubiquitous than solar panels.
Custom Organic Shirts | December 2nd, 2009