<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Solar Pricing To Be About Half the 2008 Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/27/2010-solar-pricing-to-be-about-half-the-2008-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/27/2010-solar-pricing-to-be-about-half-the-2008-cost/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custom Organic Shirts</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/27/2010-solar-pricing-to-be-about-half-the-2008-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-166908</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom Organic Shirts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27971#comment-166908</guid>
		<description>@Charlie - That thin-film cost is in units of $ per Watt, not $ per square meter. So efficiency differences are accounted for.

As for the landfill thing, don&#039;t know. Maybe they will need special recycling processes (take back or something). Not exactly an impossible hurdle. We have special waste collection for household paint, which is much more ubiquitous than solar panels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie &#8211; That thin-film cost is in units of $ per Watt, not $ per square meter. So efficiency differences are accounted for.</p>
<p>As for the landfill thing, don&#8217;t know. Maybe they will need special recycling processes (take back or something). Not exactly an impossible hurdle. We have special waste collection for household paint, which is much more ubiquitous than solar panels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/27/2010-solar-pricing-to-be-about-half-the-2008-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-165999</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27971#comment-165999</guid>
		<description>Why is it that when thin film cost is noted as being least expensive, it&#039;s never followed by its effciency is 50% of silicon based PV?  Hum, wonder why its cheap.  Also, why isn&#039;t it isn&#039;t noted that thin film is made with CaTl which in a land fill is extremely hard on the environment?  Somehow these facts just seem to get in the way of the story of thin film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that when thin film cost is noted as being least expensive, it&#8217;s never followed by its effciency is 50% of silicon based PV?  Hum, wonder why its cheap.  Also, why isn&#8217;t it isn&#8217;t noted that thin film is made with CaTl which in a land fill is extremely hard on the environment?  Somehow these facts just seem to get in the way of the story of thin film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

