<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan. 1 Emissions Reporting Deadline Draws Pundits Out of Wordwork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/12/30/jan-1-emissions-reporting-deadline-draws-pundits-out-of-wordwork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/12/30/jan-1-emissions-reporting-deadline-draws-pundits-out-of-wordwork/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/12/30/jan-1-emissions-reporting-deadline-draws-pundits-out-of-wordwork/comment-page-1/#comment-172575</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=29516#comment-172575</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a good thing the science is settled...and there is no confusion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good thing the science is settled&#8230;and there is no confusion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/12/30/jan-1-emissions-reporting-deadline-draws-pundits-out-of-wordwork/comment-page-1/#comment-171578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=29516#comment-171578</guid>
		<description>As the US federal government is one of the nation&#039;s largest emitters, shouldn&#039;t they be expected to report as well?  Avoid hypocrisy through transparency!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the US federal government is one of the nation&#8217;s largest emitters, shouldn&#8217;t they be expected to report as well?  Avoid hypocrisy through transparency!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Clark &#124; TRIRIGA</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/12/30/jan-1-emissions-reporting-deadline-draws-pundits-out-of-wordwork/comment-page-1/#comment-171574</link>
		<dc:creator>John Clark &#124; TRIRIGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=29516#comment-171574</guid>
		<description>The EPA Mandatory GHG Reporting rule is just the first step to actually regulating GHG emissions. The EPA has taken the next step with the signing of the Endangerment Finding that officially places GHG emissions under the regulatory authority of the Clean Air Act. The EPA has also recently proposed a rule that would require carbon intensive facilities to implement &quot;best practices and technologies&quot; to minimize GHG emissions.

Carbon intensive organizations need to look beyond mandatory reporting of GHG emissions and begin to implement programs to reduce the carbon intensity of facilities and processes.

Whether your organization is directly or indirectly affected by GHG regulation, the time to prepare is now. Organizations that proactively prepare for GHG regulation will be positioned to capitalize on opportunities to reduce energy use and improve environmental performance.

For more information, read our recent analysis of the impact on the EPA&#039;s Mandatory Reporting rule. http://www.tririga.com/information-center/infocenter-insights?ipg=list&amp;cat=Environmental Sustainabililty

John Clark
TRIRIGA Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EPA Mandatory GHG Reporting rule is just the first step to actually regulating GHG emissions. The EPA has taken the next step with the signing of the Endangerment Finding that officially places GHG emissions under the regulatory authority of the Clean Air Act. The EPA has also recently proposed a rule that would require carbon intensive facilities to implement &#8220;best practices and technologies&#8221; to minimize GHG emissions.</p>
<p>Carbon intensive organizations need to look beyond mandatory reporting of GHG emissions and begin to implement programs to reduce the carbon intensity of facilities and processes.</p>
<p>Whether your organization is directly or indirectly affected by GHG regulation, the time to prepare is now. Organizations that proactively prepare for GHG regulation will be positioned to capitalize on opportunities to reduce energy use and improve environmental performance.</p>
<p>For more information, read our recent analysis of the impact on the EPA&#8217;s Mandatory Reporting rule. <a href="http://www.tririga.com/information-center/infocenter-insights?ipg=list&#038;cat=Environmental" rel="nofollow">http://www.tririga.com/information-center/infocenter-insights?ipg=list&#038;cat=Environmental</a> Sustainabililty</p>
<p>John Clark<br />
TRIRIGA Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

