<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Needs a Carbon Market?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Porto</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/comment-page-1/#comment-176592</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Porto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=30058#comment-176592</guid>
		<description>&quot;Each wealthy nation has an emission limit. It adds up to a world total — a total that never changes with trade. But those who over-emit can buy rights from those that are below limits – in total we remain within the same world total, which is a cut below of what we emit today. That is all.&quot;

So did you have in mind a decreasing cap over time in order to achieve the needed emissions reductions on a global scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Each wealthy nation has an emission limit. It adds up to a world total — a total that never changes with trade. But those who over-emit can buy rights from those that are below limits – in total we remain within the same world total, which is a cut below of what we emit today. That is all.&#8221;</p>
<p>So did you have in mind a decreasing cap over time in order to achieve the needed emissions reductions on a global scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/comment-page-1/#comment-174504</link>
		<dc:creator>D Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=30058#comment-174504</guid>
		<description>At Ecolink we have taken negative carbon technologies and applied them to our product base. We have made a commitment to only produce negative carbon footprint products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Ecolink we have taken negative carbon technologies and applied them to our product base. We have made a commitment to only produce negative carbon footprint products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/comment-page-1/#comment-174036</link>
		<dc:creator>John Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=30058#comment-174036</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most lucid defenses of carbon trading I have read.  It certainly is refreshing after reading so many detractor Chicken Littles, much like we saw in the 1980&#039;s when the US Chamber and Nat&#039;l Assoc of Manufacturers presided over giving away US manufacturing.  Strange, they are both at it again, having learned nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most lucid defenses of carbon trading I have read.  It certainly is refreshing after reading so many detractor Chicken Littles, much like we saw in the 1980&#8242;s when the US Chamber and Nat&#8217;l Assoc of Manufacturers presided over giving away US manufacturing.  Strange, they are both at it again, having learned nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phililp</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/who-needs-a-carbon-market/comment-page-1/#comment-174014</link>
		<dc:creator>Phililp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=30058#comment-174014</guid>
		<description>Any time we can reduce our carbon footprint must be good for the planet.  In my case I&#039;m selling my carbon offset on ebay to the highest bidder.  You can view my auction here http://bit.ly/66mVTJ 

I think people need to stop knocking the world for creating a commodity that I can sell so easially.  I mean, how many other people do you know that are trying to make cash off an intangeble asset like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any time we can reduce our carbon footprint must be good for the planet.  In my case I&#8217;m selling my carbon offset on ebay to the highest bidder.  You can view my auction here <a href="http://bit.ly/66mVTJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/66mVTJ</a> </p>
<p>I think people need to stop knocking the world for creating a commodity that I can sell so easially.  I mean, how many other people do you know that are trying to make cash off an intangeble asset like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

