January 20, 2010
Despite Hurdles, UW Converting Coal Plant to Biomass
Proponents of a $250 million project to convert a coal-fired power plant to biomass at the University of Wisconsin-Madison say the project is moving ahead, damn the torpedoes.
Those torpedoes include the fact that the project represents nearly a fifth of the state’s capital budget from 2009-11, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal.
Other factors going against the plant are that upfront construction costs are higher than other alternatives, and that there is not an existing infrastructure nearby to process the biomass.
Finally, the regional market into which the plant is supposed to sell its excess electricity is already flooded with other options.
The plant’s conversion was prompted by a Sierra Club lawsuit. In 2008, the state pledged to stop using coal at the 1950s-era plant.
By 2013, UW aims to have the plant fully converted to a 60 percent biomass, 40 percent natural gas mix. The plant will produce about three times as much power as the one it replaces.
The conversion continues to be criticized for its high costs. Switching to natural gas would have cost half as much, according to a consultant’s report in 2008.
Responding to critics, David Helbach, administrator of the Division of State Facilities, said that the project would jump-start the state’s biofuels market.
Biofuel options include wood waste, wood chips, pelletized paper, yard waste, old tires and agricultural crops.
Advertisers
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
Sustainable Brands 2010, June 7-10, Monterey
Where the Sustainability & Brand & Design Communities Meet. >>
Pew Center Conference: Corporate Energy Efficiency
Reduce energy consumption, lower emissions and save money. >>
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 09/02/2010
- 09/01/2010
- 08/31/2010
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Nancy J. Wilson on Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
"Well done! As a green meeting planner, asking for a..."
David Miller on Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
"Excellent overview of top hotel groups! As very much..."
Maggie on Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi to Standardize Electric Car Recharging
"The last sentence in your article is incorrect. Honda is only going to..."
John Bergdoll on Bill Gates Calls for Zero Carbon Emissions by 2050
"The goal should be to ‘give back to the grid’ by 2050. Twitter..."
John Bergdoll on Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
"I looked at several of the hotel sustainability reports and..."
Iain on Las Vegas Sands Feeling Lucky With Eco 360 Initiative
"Why can’t everyone jump on this strategy!? Saves $4 for every $1 invested, that is..."
Rob Cal on BNY Mellon Office Cuts Energy Use by 20%
"Let me tell you how BNY Mellon cut energy use 20%, they shipped 20% of the jobs to India. Donald..."





Reader Comments
Tires are NOT a biofuel and must not be allowed as fuel in the reconfigured Charter Street power plant. Tires need to be recycled, not burned. They emit numerous hazardous compounds when burned. The Charter Street plant is not being fitted with the Best Available pollution Control Technology, and would likely not be able to remove the harmful tire pollutants even if it was.
Bikerbanite | January 22nd, 2010