White House Budget Suggests Abandonment of Cap and Trade
The fact that the White House is not including projected revenues from cap and trade suggests that the Obama Administration is acquiescing to the notion that Congress may not pass such legislation, observers say.
Instead, the White House budget includes a “placeholder” for revenues from cap and trade, provided that Congress passes it, reports the New York Times. The placeholder status assumes that no cap and trade revenues will be coming into the Treasury.
The $3.8 trillion budget would result in a record annual deficit of $1.56 trillion, reports Reuters. That compares to $1.41 trillion last year, which at the time represented 9.9 percent of the gross domestic product.
In energy related news and the budget, the White House plans to cut subsidies for fossil fuels to the tune of $40 billion over 10 years.
Clean energy projects would get a fresh injection of $6 billion, on top of previously announced spending.
Obama did not mention cap and trade during his State of the Union address last week, while he did mention comprehensive climate legislation.
White House aides say they are still working with members of Congress on climate legislation, according to the article.
The White House is likely to insist that any climate legislation be paid for without adding to the federal deficit.
Energy Manager News
- Mohegan Sun Pocono Casino Doesn’t Consider Cogeneration a Gamble
- Clean Power Plan: Obama’s Team Confident About Pitch to Supreme Court
- BuildingIQ Introduces Managed Services
- Solar Power Breakthrough Near?
- Battery Storage Giving Businesses a Break
- Could Ratepayers Foot the Bill for New Hampshire’s Pipelines?
- CenterPoint to Acquire Continuum’s Retail Energy Services Division
- LED Projects Must Be Carefully Planned