February 19, 2010

Consumers Have Minimal Knowledge of Corporate Environmental Performance

Bookmark and Share Email This Post Add your comments

By partnering with Earthsense, which polled U.S. consumers on their perception of corporate sustainability, and Trucost, which compiled a comprehensive quantitative assessment of companies’ global environmental impact, New Scientist magazine has discovered that U.S. consumers only have a little knowledge of companies’ actual environmental performance.

After comparing the two datasets, New Scientist found there was no correlation between the Earthsense and Trucost scores, indicating that consumers are confused about companies’ “green” credentials. More than 100 companies were scored in nine sectors including food & beverage, retail, media, travel & leisure, personal & household goods, industrial goods & services, technology, chemicals and construction materials.

One of the most significant mismatches, says New Scientist, is Fresh Del Monte Produce, which is one of the greenest companies according to U.S. consumers. However, Trucost’s analysis shows that it has the biggest environmental impact ratio of all companies in its sample.

The report also finds that Whole Foods Market has the highest consumer green perception, while Google and eBay have the lowest actual environmental impact.

The article, “Hey, green spender: The truth about eco-friendly brands“, also reveals that producers of food and drinks have the highest environmental impact but there were no significant differences in consumer perceptions between the sectors.

Other key findings show that the Coca Cola Company gets little public credit for some impressive efforts to protect the environment, and green marketing works for some company’s as highlighted by General Electric’s scores — first for consumer perception within its sector and seventh overall — thanks to its Ecomagination campaign.

The report also finds that greater disclosure of companies’ environmental impacts will help investors and consumers to make choices that promote a green economy. But some companies benefiting from underserved green reputations could be vulnerable to a consumer and investor backlash.

Environmental management & energy news delivered daily to your inbox

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this story.

 

Advertisers

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 07/29/2010
  • 07/28/2010
  • 07/27/2010

Recent Jobs

Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Matt Perry on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Hi Emily, Thank you for your article. Your background in science really comes through...."

Girard Gurgick on No Renewable Electricity Standard in Reid Energy Bill
"Does any one know why just passing a simple carbon tax is not the primary..."

Baltazar Perez on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Great article Emily and certainly environmental issues should be at the forefront..."

Tony Nocito on EPA Supports Superfund Tax Reinstatement
"Each one of the industries mentioned in this article are laden with asbestos. All of the..."

Terrence Murray on Wind Power Installations Drop to 2007 levels
"We had been hearing for a couple of months now from our project finance banking..."

Martyn on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"There’s one area of corporate Greenwash that really irks me and that’s the..."

sandee loeffler on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"We have just released a new packaging item for our plants to replace the 15 tons..."