February 22, 2010
World’s Biggest Companies Cause $2.2 Trillion in Environmental Damage
The estimated cost of environmental damage by 3,000 of the world’s biggest companies is about $2.2 trillion in 2008, according to a report to be released this summer, reports The Guardian. The biggest single impact was greenhouse gas emissions, which accounts for more than half of the total cost damage, according to the article.
Other major costs cited include local air pollution such as particulates, and the damage caused by the over-use and pollution of freshwater.
The study, conducted by consultancy Trucost, indicates that the cost of pollution and other environmental damage would cost these companies about one-third of their profits, or about six to seven percent of their combined turnover, if they were held accountable, according to The Guardian.
The goal of the study is to help investors lobby companies to reduce their environmental impact before governments act to restrict them through taxes or regulations, and to help them reduce the risk of running out of resources they need to operate.
The report includes all 500 companies on Standard & Poor’s list of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States, including Exxon Mobil, Microsoft, Proctor & Gamble and Apple, reports the New York Times.
Another UN study, “Stern for nature,” will be released later this year that will attempt to put a price on global environmental damage, with recommendations on how to prevent the damage, reports The Guardian.
Environmental management & energy news delivered daily to your inbox
Advertisers
Trends in Sustainability Performance Management
Take the lead on sustainability. - Take the lead in your industry. >>
Sustainable Agricultural Partnerships Summit
Aug 10-11, San Francisco - Measure & Reduce Water & Carbon Impacts. >>
Can you take the pain out of carbon reporting?
See how with CA ecoSoftware. >>
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 07/29/2010
- 07/28/2010
- 07/27/2010
- CEC Throws Out Edison’s Claim to RECs from Mountain View Wind Projects
- Arizona’s Energy-Efficiency Ruling to Save Utility Customers $9B over Next Decade
- IBM Partnerships to Boost Energy Efficiency in Buildings
- Brea to Cut City’s Energy Use 40%
- Zotos Mfg Plant Gets Nod to Build 3.3-MW Wind Power Project
- Roundup – Porsche, UL Environment, EPA
- Green Rating Systems: Which One is Right for You?
- Russian City Saves $26,000 Annually with LED Street Lighting
- Robert Brunner On Solar Power For Handheld Devices
- HVAC Energy Reduction SW Saves Six NY Buildings 9.9M kWh Annually
- Roundup – Hormel Foods, BMW, Microsoft
- Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
- Wind Power Installations Drop to 2007 levels
- EV Roundup: Nissan, Chevrolet, Enterprise, PG&E, Schneider Electric, Raser
- No Renewable Electricity Standard in Reid Energy Bill
- Vermont Resort Cuts Carbon Footprint with ‘Cow Power’
- CCS Technologies to Capture 65% and 90% of CO2 Emissions at Coal Power Plants
- Fuel Cell Power Plant Installed at Frozen Food Processing Plant
- Green Building Talked Up By Perkins & Will’s Peter Busby
- Large Wind Projects Get Ready to Roll in Arizona, California
- Why the BP Oil Spill is a Tragedy of the Commons, Part II
- Senators Push for a Renewable Energy Standard
- Roundup – GM, Seventh Generation, Wal-Mart
- Consumers Prefer to Charge their EVs at Home
- UPS Sustainability Report: Sets Goal to Improve Fuel Efficiency by 20%
- IT Sector Reduces Energy Costs by $2B, CO2 Emissions by 32 Million Tons
- Naval Base Lighting Retrofits Save Nearly $60,000 Annually
- TIAA-CREF CEO On Building Energy Efficiency
Charts [ see all ]
White Papers [ see all ]
- Your Customers Want Green!
- Eco-Competitiveness: Safeguarding Profitability and the World's Natural Resources
- Global Trends In Sustainability Performance Management
- The EPA's Mandatory Reporting Rule
- A Business Framework for Excelling at Enterprise Carbon Management
- Your Customers Want Green!
- What's On Your Sustainability Dashboard?
- 9 Ways to Reduce Energy Costs
Comments and Discussions
Matt Perry on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Hi Emily, Thank you for your article. Your background in science really comes through...."
Girard Gurgick on No Renewable Electricity Standard in Reid Energy Bill
"Does any one know why just passing a simple carbon tax is not the primary..."
Baltazar Perez on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Great article Emily and certainly environmental issues should be at the forefront..."
Tony Nocito on EPA Supports Superfund Tax Reinstatement
"Each one of the industries mentioned in this article are laden with asbestos. All of the..."
Terrence Murray on Wind Power Installations Drop to 2007 levels
"We had been hearing for a couple of months now from our project finance banking..."
Martyn on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"There’s one area of corporate Greenwash that really irks me and that’s the..."
sandee loeffler on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"We have just released a new packaging item for our plants to replace the 15 tons..."
Reader Comments
Even if you do not believe that CO2 contributes to global warming, reducing CO2 is the right thing to do for the environment and your business. In most all cases, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions causes reduction in costs to the business; so it’s a win for the environment and a win for business. Analyzing your current CO2 inventory, evaluating your social and economic policies and philosophies, and then implementing continuous improvement to reduce the CO2 and ensure your policies are best in class will ensure that you are compliant with industry and governmental standards that have already been implemented…..even some that have yet to be implemented.
For more information, contact: http://www.global-champions.com
Scott | March 7th, 2010